About Bad Idea AI (BAD):
Trading near $0.000000001022, the market cap stands at $706.91K with roughly $159.04K in 24-hour volume. Liquidity is currently high turnover intensity (volume/market cap 22.50%) At high turnover, spreads can stay tight, though volatility can still be elevated..
Where it trades:
Most observed spot turnover is routed through KCEX, Bilaxy and MEXC, where listings and liquidity are currently strongest. Execution quality can vary depending on which venue leads price discovery. Venue selection may matter more when turnover is uneven.
Market assessment:
Bull score 72/100 suggests strong momentum with above-average persistence with sustained follow-through in the current window set..
Risk is assessed as Low, which implies a lower-stress regime with fewer sharp swings Low-risk labels reflect relative conditions, not guarantees..
Bad Idea AI (BAD) is positioned in the Early phase,
typically associated with early-cycle setup where directional bias is still forming Rotation across sectors can be choppy in early phases..
Capped supply provides a defined upper bound for total issuance.
Conclusion: Netting the signals, conditions read as a constructive environment for trend-following strategies. Update date: 2026-02-27.
YearBull Rank is a relative ranking on YearBull designed to compare coins on a common scale and time window. A smaller rank number indicates a stronger position at that moment.
Rotation context: If the 7d is weak but 30d is strong, it can be a pullback in an up-phase.
Risk view: If the last month is chaotic, widen the lookback before concluding.
Execution context: If the line range narrows, access may be stabilizing.
Liquidity framing: If the line flatlines, the coin may be moving with its liquidity peers.
Practical note: direction and persistence matter more than the last tick.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
We use cookies and similar technologies to improve site functionality, analyze usage, and enhance user experience.
By continuing to use YearBull, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our
Privacy Policy.
Comments