About Balancer (BAL):
Snapshot pricing shows $0.148057 for Balancer (BAL), with $9.56M market cap and $572.68K in 24h volume. Market liquidity is healthy but venue-dependent (volume/market cap 5.99%) Healthy turnover can help keep spreads and slippage more contained..
Where it trades:
Spot activity clusters on venues like Paribu, Coinbase Exchange and MEXC, which account for a meaningful share of observed trading. In faster markets, venue concentration can shape intraday behavior. Venue mix can influence spreads and depth, especially during higher-volatility sessions.
Market assessment:
Bull score 0/100 suggests weak momentum with limited recovery attempts with risk of choppy price action elevated..
Performance windows show -1.61% (24h), -3.15% (7d), and -70.29% (30d). Multiple windows are negative, consistent with a defensive tape. Near-term volatility appears restrained. Risk is assessed as —, which implies conditions are updating.
A capped supply ceiling constrains maximum issuance, affecting dilution characteristics.
Conclusion: Netting the signals, conditions read as a transitional structure with no dominant directional bias. Update date: 2026-02-22.
Latest available YearBull Rank for balancer: #99999.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (daily snapshots).
Reading rule: lower is better in this ranking.
7d window (2026-02-15): #99999 → #99999 (no change).
30d window (2026-01-23): #1835 → #99999 (down by 98164).
Rotation context: Compare the 30d move with the 7d move to see if momentum is accelerating or fading.
Risk placement: If it improves then retraces fast, treat it as rotation pressure.
Execution context: If rank moves sharply, it may reflect venue mix changes rather than fundamentals.
Liquidity view: If the curve is jagged, widen the window before concluding.
Practical note: a single point is weaker than the curve shape.
YearBull Rank is a relative ranking on YearBull designed to compare coins on a common scale and time window. Smaller numbers mean the coin sits higher in the YearBull list. Treat it as a directional context tool rather than a standalone verdict.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
We use cookies and similar technologies to improve site functionality, analyze usage, and enhance user experience.
By continuing to use YearBull, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our
Privacy Policy.
Comments