About Fluid Wrapped Staked ETH (FWSTETH):
At $4,069.22, Fluid Wrapped Staked ETH (FWSTETH) carries a market cap of $61.63M and logs about $0 in 24h turnover. Liquidity reads as low relative turnover (volume/market cap 0.00%) Lower turnover suggests spot depth may be uneven across venues..
Market assessment:
Bull score 0/100 suggests weak momentum with reduced participation with continuation signals that remain fragile..
Performance windows show 0.00% (24h), 0.00% (7d), and 0.89% (30d). Returns are uneven across windows, consistent with mixed short-term structure. The 24h move sits in a calmer range. Risk is assessed as —, which implies conditions are updating.
Supply design is uncapped, implying ongoing issuance can remain part of the longer-term supply backdrop.
Conclusion: Taken together, the present setup points to a transitional structure with no dominant directional bias. Update date: 2026-02-04.
Most recent YearBull Rank reading for fluid-wrapped-staked-eth is #1801.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (reference points).
Reading rule: lower numbers mean higher placement.
7d window: no reference point available.
30d window (2026-01-23): #4029 → #1801 (up by 2228).
YearBull Rank is an internal ordering on YearBull that positions a coin relative to the rest of the tracked universe. Lower rank numbers indicate stronger placement in the current snapshot.
Risk framing: minor drift can still matter at scale. If the curve whipsaws, treat the rank as fragile.
Cycle framing: in rotations, improving rank can happen without price leadership. If both are flat, the coin may be tracking its peer basket.
Liquidity read: a steadier line can indicate steadier access. If the line reacts in bursts, watch for calendar-driven liquidity.
Access context: one venue can dominate the profile in short windows. If rank can’t hold gains, it can be concentrated pressure.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
We use cookies and similar technologies to improve site functionality, analyze usage, and enhance user experience.
By continuing to use YearBull, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our
Privacy Policy.
Comments