About Gate Wrapped BTC (GTBTC):
With Gate Wrapped BTC (GTBTC) near $75,820.00, market cap is $227.80M and 24h traded value is around $762.35K. Execution liquidity looks thin relative turnover (volume/market cap 0.33%) Low turnover can reflect limited sustained participation..
- Dominance 0.01% - suggesting a limited share of aggregate crypto value
Where it trades:
Primary spot venues for Gate Wrapped BTC (GTBTC) include Gate, Aborean Finance V3 and Kona V2, which host a large share of visible trading flow. Spot liquidity often tracks the venues with the most consistent flow. Venue coverage and concentration can affect the reliability of price discovery.
Market assessment:
Bull score 0/100 suggests weak momentum and limited buying interest with less supportive flow conditions in the near term..
Snapshot returns: 24h -3.34% · 7d -15.33% · 30d -19.42%. The windows align with a downside-biased regime and weaker follow-through. The last 24h move is modest relative to typical swings. Risk is assessed as —, which implies conditions are updating.
Uncapped issuance keeps supply growth possible over time.
Conclusion: Netting the signals, conditions read as a transitional structure with no dominant directional bias. Update date: 2026-02-04.
Newest YearBull Rank value for gate-wrapped-btc: #3464.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (daily snapshots).
Reading rule: lower is better in this ranking.
7d window: no reference point available.
30d window (2026-01-23): #3749 → #3464 (up by 285).
YearBull Rank is a comparative index on YearBull that helps contextualize a coin’s position versus others over time. Treat it as a directional context tool rather than a standalone verdict.
Risk profile: a calm line with small steps can be healthier than spikes. If the last week is quiet, the current rank is usually easier to trust.
Cycle placement: phase changes usually leave a footprint in consistency. If both are flat, the coin may be tracking its peer basket.
Liquidity posture: a steadier line can indicate steadier access. If the line reacts in bursts, watch for calendar-driven liquidity.
Exchange footprint: fragmentation can make rank more reactive. If rank improves slowly, it often reflects broader access or steadier participation.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
We use cookies and similar technologies to improve site functionality, analyze usage, and enhance user experience.
By continuing to use YearBull, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our
Privacy Policy.
Comments