About Provenance Blockchain (HASH):
Snapshot pricing shows $0.010835 for Provenance Blockchain (HASH), with $609.41M market cap and $13.81K in 24h volume. Liquidity reads as soft turnover conditions (volume/market cap 0.00%) At low turnover, price discovery can be more intermittent intraday..
- Dominance 0.04% - showing a smaller footprint in total crypto capitalization
Where it trades:
Liquidity is most consistently available on Figure Markets and Osmosis, where Provenance Blockchain (HASH) sees the bulk of observed activity. Spot liquidity often tracks the venues with the most consistent flow. Venue coverage and concentration can affect the reliability of price discovery.
Market assessment:
Bull score 37/100 suggests weak momentum with cautious participation with softer confirmation across observed windows..
Performance windows show -20.82% (24h), -21.40% (7d), and -33.67% (30d). Multiple windows are negative, consistent with a defensive tape. The session reads as higher-volatility, with sharper short-horizon movement. Risk is assessed as Low, which implies a lower-stress regime with fewer sharp swings Intraday noise can still be meaningful despite calmer conditions..
Provenance Blockchain (HASH) is positioned in the Early phase,
typically associated with early-stage participation where positioning builds gradually Early phases may show accumulation-like behavior across multiple sessions..
Capped tokenomics often reduce the role of ongoing issuance in the supply equation.
Conclusion: Bottom line: the structure currently reflects a transitional structure with no dominant directional bias. Update date: 2026-03-30.
Reading rule: rank #120 sits higher than rank #200.
7d window (2026-03-23): #4371 → #6333 (down by 1962).
30d window (2026-02-28): #5042 → #6333 (down by 1291).
YearBull Rank is a relative ranking on YearBull designed to compare coins on a common scale and time window. Smaller numbers mean the coin sits higher in the YearBull list.
Liquidity read: stable placement often correlates with stable participation. If the line reacts in bursts, watch for calendar-driven liquidity.
Cycle framing: sideways periods still reshuffle relative placement. If both are flat, the coin may be tracking its peer basket.
Risk framing: minor drift can still matter at scale. If the last week is quiet, the current rank is usually easier to trust.
Access context: fragmentation can make rank more reactive. If rank improves slowly, it often reflects broader access or steadier participation.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
We use cookies and similar technologies to improve site functionality, analyze usage, and enhance user experience.
By continuing to use YearBull, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our
Privacy Policy.
Comments