About INFINIT (IN):
INFINIT (IN) changes hands around $0.054200, alongside a $16.53M market cap and $3.58M in 24-hour volume. Liquidity reads as fast turnover relative to market cap (volume/market cap 21.66%) This turnover profile points to sustained spot participation..
Where it trades:
Spot activity clusters on venues like PancakeSwap V3 (BSC), LBank and Upbit, which account for a meaningful share of observed trading. Depth and spreads can shift as volume rotates between venues.
Market assessment:
Bull score 43/100 suggests moderate momentum with choppy follow-through with follow-through that remains uneven across sessions..
Snapshot returns: 24h 0.37% · 7d -6.62% · 30d -20.69%. The windows align with a downside-biased regime and weaker follow-through. Short-term swings appear limited in the last day. Risk is assessed as Low, which implies relatively stable conditions with controlled volatility Intraday noise can still be meaningful despite calmer conditions..
INFINIT (IN) is positioned in the Early phase,
typically associated with early-cycle setup where directional bias is still forming Liquidity can improve as the cycle matures..
Capped issuance places emphasis on demand and circulation rather than ongoing expansion of supply.
Conclusion: From a structure view, the setup currently reflects a transitional structure with no dominant directional bias. Update date: 2026-03-30.
Reading rule: rank #120 sits higher than rank #200.
7d window (2026-03-23): #639 → #673 (down by 34).
30d window (2026-02-28): #1568 → #673 (up by 895).
YearBull Rank is a relative ranking on YearBull designed to compare coins on a common scale and time window. Use it as positioning context over time, not as a promise.
Market access: If rank moves sharply, it may reflect venue mix changes rather than fundamentals.
Risk context: Read it as "how stable is the position" rather than "how exciting is today".
Rotation context: If the 7d is weak but 30d is strong, it can be a pullback in an up-phase.
Turnover context: If the curve is jagged, widen the window before concluding.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
We use cookies and similar technologies to improve site functionality, analyze usage, and enhance user experience.
By continuing to use YearBull, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our
Privacy Policy.
Comments