About Infrared Bera (IBERA):
At $0.385822, Infrared Bera (IBERA) carries a market cap of $38.88M and logs about $132.29K in 24h turnover. Market liquidity is thin turnover profile (volume/market cap 0.34%) At low turnover, price discovery can be more intermittent intraday..
Where it trades:
Most observed spot turnover is routed through Kodiak V3, where listings and liquidity are currently strongest. Cross-venue dispersion can increase during fast sessions. Venue selection may matter more when turnover is uneven.
Market assessment:
Bull score 0/100 suggests weak momentum with a defensive tone with risk of choppy price action elevated..
Windowed performance: -13.61% (24h), -34.07% (7d), -38.59% (30d). The windows align with a downside-biased regime and weaker follow-through. Short-term volatility is elevated on the 24h window. Risk is assessed as —, which implies conditions are updating.
Uncapped design implies supply growth can persist, with net issuance influenced by protocol mechanics.
Conclusion: In summary, current conditions suggest a transitional structure with no dominant directional bias. Update date: 2026-02-06.
Newest YearBull Rank value for infrared-bera: #5954.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (reference points).
Reading rule: smaller rank numbers are better.
7d window: no reference point available.
30d window (2026-01-23): #2259 → #5954 (down by 3695).
Flow context: If the line improves during quiet periods, it can be accumulation. relative rank is sensitive to who is active in the window.
Trading footprint: If the line is step-like, watch for discrete market changes. consolidation can make rank more stable.
Regime context: If both windows align, the direction is clearer. a stable phase often tightens the rank range.
Volatility posture: If it is flat for long, the coin may be tracking the cohort. big jumps can be data-driven, but also rotation-driven.
YearBull Rank is a comparative ordering used on YearBull to place a coin versus others using a consistent set of inputs. Treat it as a directional context tool rather than a standalone verdict.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
We use cookies and similar technologies to improve site functionality, analyze usage, and enhance user experience.
By continuing to use YearBull, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our
Privacy Policy.
Comments