About Liquity USD (LUSD):
Liquity USD (LUSD) trades around $1.0250, backed by $30.10M capitalization and $20.94K of 24h volume. Market liquidity is thin relative turnover (volume/market cap 0.07%) Lower turnover can make short-term moves feel jumpier in fast markets..
Where it trades:
The asset is actively traded on leading platforms such as Curve (Ethereum), Maverick Protocol V1 (Ethereum) and Velodrome Finance V2 (Optimism), which currently concentrate a large share of its spot market activity. Venue leadership can rotate as liquidity conditions change. Venue selection may matter more when turnover is uneven.
Market assessment:
Bull score 0/100 - Not applicable for stable pricing design. Risk: —Stable. Cycle: —Stable.
Conclusion: Conclusion: the market structure currently signals a transitional structure with no dominant directional bias. Update date: 2026-03-30.
Newest YearBull Rank value for liquity-usd: #100000.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (nearest points).
Reading rule: smaller rank numbers are better.
7d window (2026-03-23): #100000 → #100000 (no change).
30d window (2026-02-28): #100000 → #100000 (no change).
Liquidity posture: stable placement often correlates with stable participation. If the curve improves but won’t hold, treat it as flow-driven.
Cycle note: in rotations, improving rank can happen without price leadership. If the line breaks range, confirm with more than one week.
Risk framing: short bursts do not always translate into durable placement. If the curve whipsaws, treat the rank as fragile.
Exchange footprint: venue mix can alter rank without changing the narrative. If the line range widens, access or routing may be changing.
YearBull Rank is an internal ordering on YearBull that positions a coin relative to the rest of the tracked universe. It is best read as relative context across time windows, not as a guarantee.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
We use cookies and similar technologies to improve site functionality, analyze usage, and enhance user experience.
By continuing to use YearBull, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our
Privacy Policy.
Comments