About Magic Internet Money (Ethereum) (MIM):
Magic Internet Money (Ethereum) (MIM) is quoted at $0.989114; market cap is $55.01M and 24-hour volume is $4.78K. Liquidity remains muted turnover compared with market size (volume/market cap 0.01%) At low turnover, price discovery can be more intermittent intraday..
Where it trades:
Liquidity is most consistently available on Curve (Ethereum), Sushiswap and Uniswap V3 (Ethereum), where Magic Internet Money (Ethereum) (MIM) sees the bulk of observed activity. Venue mix can influence spreads, slippage, and short-term volatility. A broader venue footprint can help smooth execution during normal conditions.
Market assessment:
Bull score 0/100 suggests weak momentum with reduced participation with continuation signals that remain fragile..
Risk is assessed as —, which implies conditions are updating.
Uncapped issuance keeps supply growth possible over time.
Conclusion: Taken together, the present setup points to a transitional structure with no dominant directional bias. Update date: 2026-02-06.
Latest available YearBull Rank for magic-internet-money: #100000.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (daily snapshots).
Reading rule: lower is better in this ranking.
7d window: no reference point available.
30d window (2026-01-23): #3625 → #100000 (down by 96375).
YearBull Rank is a relative ranking on YearBull designed to compare coins on a common scale and time window. Treat it as a directional context tool rather than a standalone verdict.
Risk profile: a calm line with small steps can be healthier than spikes. If the curve whipsaws, treat the rank as fragile.
Orderflow context: a steadier line can indicate steadier access. If the curve improves but won’t hold, treat it as flow-driven.
Cycle framing: in rotations, improving rank can happen without price leadership. If both are flat, the coin may be tracking its peer basket.
Access context: one venue can dominate the profile in short windows. If rank can’t hold gains, it can be concentrated pressure.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
We use cookies and similar technologies to improve site functionality, analyze usage, and enhance user experience.
By continuing to use YearBull, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our
Privacy Policy.
Comments