About MAI (MIMATIC):
With MAI (MIMATIC) near $0.997719, market cap is $12.11M and 24h traded value is around $7.70K. Liquidity remains soft turnover conditions (volume/market cap 0.06%) Lower turnover can make short-term moves feel jumpier in fast markets..
Where it trades:
A significant share of spot activity is hosted on Uniswap V3 (Polygon), Quickswap (v3) and Curve (Polygon), where MAI (MIMATIC) is most commonly traded. Trading conditions can differ by venue due to fee structure and liquidity programs. Liquidity distribution across venues can shift during fast market moves.
Market assessment:
Bull score 0/100 - Not informative for stablecoins. Risk: —Stable. Cycle: —Stable.
Conclusion: Conclusion: the market structure currently signals a transitional structure with no dominant directional bias. Update date: 2026-03-30.
Most recent YearBull Rank reading for mimatic is #100000.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (reference points).
Reading rule: lower numbers mean higher placement.
7d window (2026-03-23): #100000 → #100000 (no change).
30d window (2026-02-28): #100000 → #100000 (no change).
YearBull Rank is an internal ordering on YearBull that positions a coin relative to the rest of the tracked universe. Lower values mean higher placement in the YearBull ordering. It is best read as relative context across time windows, not as a guarantee.
Risk framing: short bursts do not always translate into durable placement. If the curve whipsaws, treat the rank as fragile.
Liquidity posture: a steadier line can indicate steadier access. If the line drifts, liquidity may be gradually shifting.
Cycle placement: in rotations, improving rank can happen without price leadership. If both are flat, the coin may be tracking its peer basket.
Access context: one venue can dominate the profile in short windows. If rank can’t hold gains, it can be concentrated pressure.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
We use cookies and similar technologies to improve site functionality, analyze usage, and enhance user experience.
By continuing to use YearBull, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our
Privacy Policy.
Comments