About VIBECOIN (VIBECOIN):
Trading near $0.000046, the market cap stands at $45.81K with roughly $11.81K in 24-hour volume. Execution liquidity looks fast turnover relative to market cap (volume/market cap 25.78%) Very high turnover can coincide with faster intraday rotations..
Market assessment:
Bull score 0/100 suggests weak momentum with reduced participation with limited upside traction on this snapshot..
YearBull Rank #5,429 - YearBull Rank is a context label for structure, not a measure of brand strength. Risk is assessed as High, which implies elevated uncertainty, where price movements may become sharp and irregular High-risk regimes can see rapid repricing when liquidity shifts..
VIBECOIN (VIBECOIN) is positioned in the Mid phase,
typically associated with a continuation phase where trend-following dominates Mid phases often align with stronger trend persistence..
Supply design is not fully disclosed in the snapshot context.
Conclusion: In summary, current conditions suggest a fragile setup with increased downside sensitivity. Update date: 2026-02-27.
YearBull Rank update
Current YearBull Rank for vibecoin-2: #5429.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank movement (time windows).
Reading rule: a smaller rank number indicates stronger placement.
- 7d window: no reference point available.
- 30d window: no reference point available.
YearBull Rank is a comparative index on YearBull that helps contextualize a coin’s position versus others over time. It is best read as relative context across time windows, not as a guarantee.
Liquidity context: peer movement can shift relative placement even without news.
Venue context: improvement with higher churn can be a rotation phase.
Downside posture: consistency often matters more than speed.
Trend context: a single week rarely defines a phase on its own.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
Comments