Cricket The Dog (CRICKET) market snapshot:
Price $0.00001581, market capitalization $15.20K,
and reported 24-hour volume $2.21K.
Trading activity:
Reported 24-hour volume equals 14.54% of market capitalization.
YearBull indicators:
YearBull Rank #6,624. Bull Score 32/100.
Risk Low.
Cycle Mid. Observed price change: 24h -1.13% · 7d -42.70% · 30d -66.30%.
Values are descriptive and should be read together rather than as a price forecast.
Read the YearBull methodology.
Snapshot date: 2026-09-12.
Methodology responsibility:
YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by
Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher.
This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.
YearBull Rank context
YearBull Rank now for cricket-the-dog: #6624.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (nearest points).
Reading rule: a smaller rank number indicates stronger placement.
- 7d window (2026-09-05): #7512 → #6624 (up by 888).
- 30d window (2026-08-19): #5106 → #6624 (down by 1518).
YearBull Rank is a comparative index on YearBull that helps contextualize a coin’s position versus others over time. Lower values mean higher placement in the YearBull ordering. It is meant for comparison and tracking, not certainty.
Risk framing: minor drift can still matter at scale. If the last week is quiet, the current rank is usually easier to trust.
Cycle placement: sideways periods still reshuffle relative placement. If the line breaks range, confirm with more than one week.
Orderflow context: deep markets usually produce smoother rank paths. If the line drifts, liquidity may be gradually shifting.
Market structure: venue mix can alter rank without changing the narrative. If the line range widens, access or routing may be changing.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
Comments