Four (FORM)

Overview

Four (FORM) market snapshot: Price $0.200449, market capitalization $76.54M, and reported 24-hour volume $2.81M.

Trading activity: Reported 24-hour volume equals 3.67% of market capitalization. The local markets snapshot lists Binance, OrangeX and LBank among venues with observed trading activity.

YearBull indicators: Bull Score 49/100. YB Market Risk Low. This relative market-volatility label is not an investment-safety assessment. Cycle Early. Observed price change: 24h 0.19% · 7d -8.11% · 30d -28.36%.

Values are descriptive and should be read together rather than as a price forecast. Read the YearBull methodology. Snapshot date: 2026-10-31. Data history: 90 days available in the latest 90-day window.

Methodology responsibility: YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher. This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.

What is Four (FORM)?

YearBull Project Summary: Four (FORM) is tracked under four. The local profile associates it with Gaming (GameFi), BNB Chain Ecosystem, Launchpad. The source profile maps it to binance-smart-chain.

Four (FORM) project facts

  • Source tags: Gaming (GameFi), BNB Chain Ecosystem, Launchpad
  • Recorded networks: Binance Smart Chain

Official links and contract records appear in Key Facts. Project details can change, so verify current information with the project.

Four (FORM) FAQ

What practical role does FORM play in Four?

Four originated as BinaryX, a project associated with blockchain games and initial game offerings. In September 2024, the project proposed reducing unminted BNX tokens and described BinaryX as a GameFi and IGO platform. In February 2025, it announced a rebrand to Four and said the project was expanding from GameFi and IGO activity toward a wider DeFi ecosystem linked to Four.meme, a fair-launch platform for meme tokens on BNB Chain.

What does this part of Four's design mean in practice?

Four.meme is presented in the project’s announcements as a fair-launch platform incubated and launched by the former BinaryX team on July 3, 2024. The available integration documentation describes a BNB Chain-only system in which users authenticate through an API, submit token metadata, receive signed creation data, and then call a TokenManager contract on-chain. This creates a clear separation between the web service that prepares launch parameters and the blockchain contract that executes token creation.

How are governance and operational control handled in Four?

Four’s public announcements link major direction changes to community votes, including the 2024 rebrand and the proposed supply reduction. However, the reviewed sources do not establish the voting quorum, execution process, delegation rules, or whether approved decisions are enforced automatically by smart contracts. They also do not identify a current governance forum or publish a complete map of administrative privileges.

Who is Four intended for, and what should those users understand?

The intended user groups span several categories: players and game developers from the BinaryX era, projects seeking an IGO or launchpad route, creators launching tokens through Four.meme, and community members using FORM in governance or ecosystem programs. This breadth may create more possible demand channels than a single-product token, but it also makes the investment case dependent on several different products retaining users at the same time.

Which dependencies and limitations matter when evaluating Four?

FORM depends on BNB Chain for token settlement and on the Four.meme web services and contracts for the launchpad-related functions described in current integration material. Users also depend on the correct contract address, functioning swap or migration processes, compatible wallets, and available trading venues. The project’s official website now presenting an RWA platform rather than the GameFi and meme-launch architecture described in its earlier announcements makes product continuity difficult to assess from public sources alone.

Four metric comparison

This comparison is a stored snapshot generated 2026-10-29 06:30 UTC from 299 daily observations available from 2025-12-30 through 2026-10-29. It is separate from the latest analytical cards above. Percentiles compare the snapshot value with that day's analytical universe; a higher percentile means a larger observed value, not necessarily a better investment characteristic.

MetricSnapshot30d before90d beforeChange vs 30dUniverse percentile
Price$0.2182$0.2875$0.2131-24.1%n/a
Market cap$83.32M$109.75M$81.38M-24.1%P96.1
YearBull Rank#2,511#854#227Lower by 1,657P71.0
Bull Score45/10065/10056/100-20.0 ptsP46.1
Turnover2.34%3.47%4.97%-1.1 ptsP67.4
YB Market RiskLowLowLowUnchangedn/a
CycleEarlyEarlyEarlyUnchangedn/a

Median absolute daily movement 2.49%; distance from the highest local daily price -45.1%; circulating supply change 0.0%. These measurements are descriptive and do not predict future direction.

Editorial research. Identity, project facts, sources, and risks below belong to the dated editorial review. The live analytical snapshot above may be newer and is generated separately from stored market data.

Four Overview

Four (FORM) is tracked under four. The local profile associates it with Gaming (GameFi), BNB Chain Ecosystem, Launchpad. The source profile maps it to binance-smart-chain.

Asset Role and Supply

Its role should be evaluated through network or product use, supply design, governance, liquidity, and trading-venue quality. The reviewed record shows circulating supply about 381.87 million FORM, total supply about 572.30 million FORM, maximum supply about 580.00 million FORM. It classifies supply as capped. Supply fields may change through issuance, burns, migrations, or source revisions and should be checked against project records.

Market Structure

At the 2026-09-12 review, the local snapshot placed Four at market-cap rank #283, with market capitalization about $97.00 million and reported 24-hour volume of $8.38 million. These values describe observed scale and turnover, not fair value or guaranteed executable liquidity.

YearBull Perspective

The dated snapshot recorded YearBull Rank #520, Bull Score 56/100, Risk Low, and Cycle Early. Rank, Bull, Risk, and Cycle answer different questions and should be read together.

Key Risks

Material risks include market volatility, liquidity deterioration, protocol or governance failure, concentration, and regulatory change. Historical prices, rankings, and classifications do not predict future performance. Verify contract addresses, network support, custody, and venue availability before acting.

Primary Sources and Review Scope

YearBull methodology · Official website. Profile and market fields were checked against locally stored source records on 2026-09-12. The live snapshot above may be newer than this editorial review.

Four (FORM): From BinaryX GameFi to a BNB Chain Launchpad Ecosystem

Four is the rebranded successor to BinaryX, combining a legacy GameFi and IGO platform with the Four.meme token-launch service. FORM is the project’s BNB Chain token, but its practical role and current product direction require careful reading because public project materials describe more than one platform focus.

A rebrand with a broader platform brief

Four originated as BinaryX, a project associated with blockchain games and initial game offerings. In September 2024, the project proposed reducing unminted BNX tokens and described BinaryX as a GameFi and IGO platform. In February 2025, it announced a rebrand to Four and said the project was expanding from GameFi and IGO activity toward a wider DeFi ecosystem linked to Four.meme, a fair-launch platform for meme tokens on BNB Chain. These statements describe the project’s intended direction; they do not by themselves establish the scale or durability of current usage.

The project’s public identity is currently inconsistent. The Four Medium publication still presents Four as a GameFi, IGO, memes, and AI ecosystem formerly known as BinaryX, while the current official website at official.four.meme describes a tokenized real-world-asset platform focused on minerals, energy, and computing power. The reviewed materials do not explain whether this is a completed strategic change, a separate product direction, or a domain transition. That mismatch is a material information risk for anyone assessing the token’s present utility.

What Four.meme contributes

Four.meme is presented in the project’s announcements as a fair-launch platform incubated and launched by the former BinaryX team on July 3, 2024. The available integration documentation describes a BNB Chain-only system in which users authenticate through an API, submit token metadata, receive signed creation data, and then call a TokenManager contract on-chain. This creates a clear separation between the web service that prepares launch parameters and the blockchain contract that executes token creation.

The integration references identify separate contract versions for Four.meme. TokenManager V1 is described as handling tokens created before September 5, 2024, while TokenManager2 supports creation and trading for later tokens. A helper contract is used to identify a token’s version and associated manager. The documentation also lists optional tax-token parameters, including trading fees and allocations for burning, liquidity, dividends, or a recipient. These mechanics belong to the launchpad infrastructure, not automatically to FORM itself.

FORM’s token role

FORM is the BEP-20 successor to BNX under the project’s 2025 rebrand. Four announced a 1:1 BNX-to-FORM swap and published the replacement contract address as 0x5b73A93b4E5e4f1FD27D8b3F8C97D69908b5E284. The project said existing BNX use cases would transfer to Four and that FORM would serve as the project’s governance token, with additional utility expected across Four.meme and future businesses. Those are project-stated functions; the reviewed sources do not provide a current, detailed schedule showing which applications actively require FORM.

The project’s supply policy has also been shaped through community voting. A July 2024 proposal sought to reduce the maximum BNX supply from 2.1 billion to 580 million by removing unminted tokens and described the change as a move toward a deflationary model. The local YearBull record lists a maximum supply near 580 million FORM, but the older announcement is evidence of the proposal and intended change rather than a substitute for a current on-chain supply audit.

Governance and upgrade control

Four’s public announcements link major direction changes to community votes, including the 2024 rebrand and the proposed supply reduction. However, the reviewed sources do not establish the voting quorum, execution process, delegation rules, or whether approved decisions are enforced automatically by smart contracts. They also do not identify a current governance forum or publish a complete map of administrative privileges. FORM should therefore be treated as a governance token by project description, while the practical degree of holder control remains unresolved.

Who the system is intended to serve

The intended user groups span several categories: players and game developers from the BinaryX era, projects seeking an IGO or launchpad route, creators launching tokens through Four.meme, and community members using FORM in governance or ecosystem programs. This breadth may create more possible demand channels than a single-product token, but it also makes the investment case dependent on several different products retaining users at the same time. The available sources provide descriptions of these audiences but limited independently verifiable evidence of present activity.

Dependencies and unresolved limitations

FORM depends on BNB Chain for token settlement and on the Four.meme web services and contracts for the launchpad-related functions described in current integration material. Users also depend on the correct contract address, functioning swap or migration processes, compatible wallets, and available trading venues. The project’s official website now presenting an RWA platform rather than the GameFi and meme-launch architecture described in its earlier announcements makes product continuity difficult to assess from public sources alone.

Key takeaways

  • Four is the rebranded successor to BinaryX, with a stated shift from GameFi and IGOs toward a broader BNB Chain ecosystem.
  • Four.meme uses an off-chain API workflow together with BNB Chain token-manager contracts for token creation and trading.
  • FORM replaced BNX through a stated 1:1 migration and is described by the project as a governance and ecosystem token.
  • The project has used community voting for major changes, but the enforceability and scope of current governance remain unclear.
  • Public project materials currently describe conflicting directions: a former GameFi and meme-launch ecosystem versus an RWA-focused official website.
  • Supply figures and token utility should be checked against current on-chain records and active product documentation rather than historical announcements alone.

Risks and open questions

  • Product-direction risk: the current official website describes tokenized real-world assets, while the project’s Medium materials emphasize GameFi, IGOs, memes, and Four.meme.
  • Utility risk: project announcements describe governance and expanding ecosystem use, but the reviewed sources do not document a complete set of active applications that require FORM.
  • Governance risk: public voting is referenced, but quorum, execution, delegation, and administrative-control details are not sufficiently documented.
  • Migration and contract risk: users must distinguish the FORM contract from legacy BNX and verify wallet, exchange, and network support.
  • Launchpad dependency risk: Four.meme activity depends on BNB Chain, the launchpad API, token-manager contracts, and the continued availability of related services.
  • Verification risk: the reviewed block-explorer page was accessible only as a limited page view, so current holder concentration, owner permissions, and live supply should be independently checked before publication or use.

YearBull Rank timeline

Newest YearBull Rank value for four: #3093.

Rank timeline (last 365 days)

Rank change (nearest points).

Reading rule: lower is better in this ranking.

  • 7d window (2026-10-24): #3019 → #3093 (down by 74).
  • 30d window (2026-10-01): #1170 → #3093 (down by 1923).

Cycle context: If the 30d is noisy, increase the lookback to avoid over-reading. a stable phase often tightens the rank range.

Trading footprint: If the line breaks range, confirm it across a longer window. changes can follow how the coin is routed across markets.

Liquidity note: If the line improves during quiet periods, it can be accumulation. bursty volume can create temporary re-ordering.

Risk posture: If you see repeated snap-backs, assume sensitivity to one factor. ranking moves can reflect regime shifts rather than one-off events.

YearBull Rank is a comparative index on YearBull that helps contextualize a coin’s position versus others over time. It is a context signal for relative placement, not an outcome forecast.

Editorial note: This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of Alan Zelvin, Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher. The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards. Methodology · Editorial Policy
Research context

Related research and comparable assets

All hubs →

Similar coins

Popular by YearBull Rank

Four (FORM) Markets

Venue refresh pending. Markets last checked: 2026-09-22. The next refresh is queued in the hourly updater. Venue listings and volumes are stored snapshots, not live quotes.
Exchange Top Pair Stored 24h volume (snapshot) Trust Rank
Binance FORM/USDT $26.42M #2
OrangeX FORM/USDT $7.58M #113
LBank FORM/USDT $7.07M #19
Toobit FORM/USDT $2.82M #23
DigiFinex FORM/USDT $2.66M #30
PancakeSwap V3 (BSC) FORM/BSC-USD $2.18M #172
Ourbit FORM/USDT $2.03M #18
Bitget FORM/USDT $1.42M #6
XT.COM FORM/USDT $1.31M #64
KCEX FORM/USDT $1.14M #50

Listings are ordered by reported snapshot volume. Trust Rank is an external venue-quality indicator; it is not an endorsement or a solvency guarantee.