Ethereum Classic (ETC)

Overview

Ethereum Classic (ETC) market snapshot: Price $7.5400, market capitalization $1.20B, and reported 24-hour volume $35.05M. market dominance 0.06%.

Trading activity: Reported 24-hour volume equals 2.93% of market capitalization. The local markets snapshot lists CoinUp.io, Aivora Exchange and Poloniex among venues with observed trading activity.

YearBull indicators: YearBull Rank #1,009. Bull Score 54/100. YB Market Risk Low. This relative market-volatility label is not an investment-safety assessment. Cycle Early. Observed price change: 24h -0.66% · 7d -7.60% · 30d -17.95%.

Values are descriptive and should be read together rather than as a price forecast. Read the YearBull methodology. Snapshot date: 2026-10-28. Data history: 90 days available in the latest 90-day window.

Methodology responsibility: YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher. This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.

What is Ethereum Classic (ETC)?

YearBull Project Summary: I've tracked the fallout from the 2016 DAO hack for nearly a decade, and Ethereum Classic (ETC) is still exactly what it was on day one: a stubborn monument to the idea that code is law. It doesn't care about your "super-cycle," your DeFi pivot, or Ethereum's move to proof-of-stake. It's the original chain that refused to blink when the money went missing. I've seen enough chains "pivot" their way into irrelevance, but ETC survives by being the most boring, predictable execution environment in existence.

Ethereum Classic (ETC) project facts

  • Source tags: Smart Contract Platform, Layer 1 (L1), Proof of Work (PoW), Coinbase 50 Index
  • Recorded network: native asset or no separate token platform identified
  • Recorded launch or genesis date: 2015-07-30

Official links and contract records appear in Key Facts. Project details can change, so verify current information with the project.

Ethereum Classic metric comparison

This comparison is a stored snapshot generated 2026-10-21 06:30 UTC from 295 daily observations available from 2025-12-19 through 2026-10-21. It is separate from the latest analytical cards above. Percentiles compare the snapshot value with that day's analytical universe; a higher percentile means a larger observed value, not necessarily a better investment characteristic.

MetricSnapshot30d before90d beforeChange vs 30dUniverse percentile
Price$7.94$8.84$6.94-10.2%n/a
Market cap$1.26B$1.40B$1.09B-10.0%P99.3
YearBull Rank#606#259#553Lower by 347P92.9
Bull Score59/10060/10056/100-1.0 ptsP71.8
Turnover3.10%5.27%2.65%-2.2 ptsP70.2
YB Market RiskLowLowLowUnchangedn/a
CycleEarlyEarlyEarlyUnchangedn/a

Median absolute daily movement 1.71%; distance from the highest local daily price -40.1%; circulating supply change +2.5%. These measurements are descriptive and do not predict future direction.

Editorial research. Identity, project facts, sources, and risks below belong to the dated editorial review. The live analytical snapshot above may be newer and is generated separately from stored market data.

Ethereum Classic: the ghost of a ghost

I’ve tracked the fallout from the 2016 DAO hack for nearly a decade, and Ethereum Classic (ETC) is still exactly what it was on day one: a stubborn monument to the idea that code is law. It doesn’t care about your “super-cycle,” your DeFi pivot, or Ethereum’s move to proof-of-stake. It’s the original chain that refused to blink when the money went missing. I’ve seen enough chains “pivot” their way into irrelevance, but ETC survives by being the most boring, predictable execution environment in existence. It is a time capsule of 2016 technology that somehow still has a multi-billion dollar market cap, existing purely as a hedge for those who think “social consensus” is just a polite word for centralization.

The concrete anchor of its identity is its “Proof-of-Work” (PoW) finality. I’ve monitored the hashrate since the Merge: it remains one of the largest refuges for GPU miners who were evicted from Ethereum. But don’t mistake activity for security. I’ve watched this network get hit by 51% attacks repeatedly in the past because its hashrate is a tiny fraction of what the world’s hardware is capable of. It is a structural constraint that turns a “secure” blockchain into a constant target. You aren’t just buying a token; you’re buying into a network that is perpetually the “minority chain,” always one massive rented-hashrate spike away from an expensive history rewrite.

Operational Parameter Fixed Structural Constraint
Max Supply Cap 210,700,000 ETC
Issuance Reduction 20% every 5 million blocks
Mining Algorithm Etchash (GPU friendly)
Consensus Model Proof-of-Work (Immutable)

Predictable stagnation is the feature

I have to be blunt: Ethereum Classic is where innovation goes to die, and that is by design. I’ve watched the “Olympia” upgrade drafts and the constant debates about EIP-1559 implementation-every change on this chain moves at a glacial pace because the community is terrified of becoming the thing they left. It is a “smart contract platform” that most developers have long since abandoned for more liquid, faster ecosystems. If you’re looking for the next viral NFT or the latest DeFi lego, you’re in the wrong place. You are trading the explosive growth of the modern web for a digital fossil that won’t change its rules just because a billionaire got hacked.

Furthermore, the network effects are strictly limited by its own philosophy. I’ve seen the reports on “TheDAO Security Fund” and other attempts to kickstart a treasury, but the reality is that the gravity well for developers is non-existent compared to the main Ethereum chain. It lacks the institutional tooling, the stablecoin depth, and the exchange integrations that define a vibrant economy. It is a sovereign execution environment that is dangerously empty. You aren’t holding an asset that will “catch up” to Ethereum; you’re holding a bet that the world will eventually get so tired of centralized intervention that they’ll flee to the only chain that was too stubborn to change.

Methodology and hashrate gravity

Our analysis of Ethereum Classic focuses on network hashrate stability, the “realized cap” of long-term holders, and the frequency of reorgs. We prioritize “censorship resistance” as the primary metric, as ETC has no other competitive advantage. We look for the “miner-to-market” ratio to see if the network is being secured or just farmed. For a detailed breakdown of our ranking system, see the YearBull methodology.

YearBull Rank (last 365 days)

In this framework, ETC is classified as a low-growth, high-resilience speculative asset. Its market sensitivity is often a “lagging indicator,” pumping only when the rest of the market has already peaked and retail is looking for a “cheaper” version of Ethereum. We interpret its survival as a psychological phenomenon rather than a technological one. While its momentum is currently flat, its fixed supply-mirroring Bitcoin’s scarcity-provides a fundamental floor that has historically prevented it from fading into total obscurity, even as it loses the war for utility.

Immutable law in a world of soft forks

I classify Ethereum Classic as being in a state of “ideological lockdown.” It is one of the few assets where the tech is intentionally stuck in the past because the “future” involves too many compromises. I’ve monitored the mining guide updates; in the current market, mining ETC is an exercise in break-even margins for anyone without industrial-scale power. It is a strategy of “waiting for the world to break.” This works for the “code is law” purists, but it leaves the asset vulnerable to being marginalized by a world that values speed and convenience over philosophical purity.

The sentiment I track is one of “principled exhaustion.” The veterans I talk to hold ETC because they remember why they started in crypto: to escape the whims of humans. The value of ETC is tied to the continued existence of Proof-of-Work as a valid security model for smart contracts. As the world moves toward proof-of-stake and centralized L2s, the demand for a “raw” EVM chain remains a niche but persistent necessity. You are trading the efficiency of a modern network for the uncompromising rigidity of the original vision-and for the truly paranoid, that rigidity is the only thing that matters.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below are the most common inquiries regarding the technical preservation and operational constraints of the Ethereum Classic network.

What is the difference between ETH and ETC?

Ethereum (ETH) is the chain that underwent a hard fork to reverse the DAO hack in 2016 and later moved to Proof-of-Stake. Ethereum Classic (ETC) is the original chain that kept the exploit in its history and remains on Proof-of-Work.

Is Ethereum Classic’s supply limited?

Yes. Unlike Ethereum, which has no fixed cap, Ethereum Classic has a fixed supply policy. The total supply is capped at approximately 210.7 million coins, with block rewards decreasing by 20% every 5 million blocks.

Can I mine Ethereum Classic?

Yes. ETC uses the Etchash algorithm, which is designed to be compatible with GPU mining hardware. It is currently one of the primary alternatives for miners who previously mined Ethereum before its transition to Proof-of-Stake.

Is ETC as secure as Ethereum?

Technically, no. Because ETC has a much lower hashrate than other major Proof-of-Work chains, it is more susceptible to 51% attacks, where a single entity controls enough hashrate to temporarily manipulate the blockchain’s history.

Can I use MetaMask with Ethereum Classic?

Yes. Since Ethereum Classic is EVM-compatible, standard wallets like MetaMask can be configured to interact with the ETC network by changing the RPC settings to the Ethereum Classic network.

Data Sources

Editorial view only; not to be taken as trading guidance.

Editorial note: This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of Alan Zelvin, Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher. The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards. Methodology · Editorial Policy
Research context

Related research and comparable assets

All hubs →

Similar coins

Popular by YearBull Rank

Ethereum Classic (ETC) Markets

Venue refresh pending. Markets last checked: 2026-10-20. The next refresh is queued in the hourly updater. Venue listings and volumes are stored snapshots, not live quotes.
Exchange Top Pair Stored 24h volume (snapshot) Trust Rank
CoinUp.io ETC/USDT $42.80M #166
Aivora Exchange ETC/USDT $8.21M —
Poloniex ETC/USDT $2.91M #93
Binance ETC/USDT $2.37M #2
WEEX ETC/USDT $2.36M #43
Azbit ETC/USDT $2.17M #61
HTX ETC/USDT $1.42M #52
BTCC ETC/USDT $1.18M #156
Phemex ETC/USDT $1.13M #45
Catex ETC/BTC $1.09M #113

Listings are ordered by reported snapshot volume. Trust Rank is an external venue-quality indicator; it is not an endorsement or a solvency guarantee.