About FOMO Base (FOMO):
Trading near $0.00000365, the market cap stands at $36.46K with roughly $2 in 24-hour volume. Liquidity remains low turnover intensity (volume/market cap 0.00%) This turnover profile often comes with patchier order-book depth..
Market assessment:
Bull score 0/100 suggests weak momentum with limited recovery attempts with a range-to-down bias still present..
Windowed change reads 0.00% over 24h, 12.79% over 7d, and 11.72% over 30d. Short and medium windows are supportive, consistent with constructive momentum.
Short-term swings appear limited in the last day. Risk is assessed as High, which implies a high-variance environment where liquidity can thin abruptly Risk metrics can move quickly as the market reprices..
FOMO Base (FOMO) is positioned in the Mid phase,
typically associated with trend continuation with increasing participation and volume This phase often supports more consistent breakout behavior..
Supply design details are limited in the current snapshot fields.
Conclusion: Conclusion: the market structure currently signals a fragile setup with increased downside sensitivity. Update date: 2026-04-20.
YearBull Rank on this page
Latest available YearBull Rank for fomo-base: #6532.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank movement (time windows).
Reading rule: a smaller rank number indicates stronger placement.
- 7d window: no reference point available.
- 30d window: no reference point available.
YearBull Rank is a relative ranking on YearBull designed to compare coins on a common scale and time window. Lower rank numbers correspond to stronger relative placement. It is best read as relative context across time windows, not as a guarantee.
Cycle view: If the 7d is weak but 30d is strong, it can be a pullback in an up-phase.
Risk context: Read it as "how stable is the position" rather than "how exciting is today".
Route context: If rank moves sharply, it may reflect venue mix changes rather than fundamentals.
Turnover context: If the curve jumps, check whether the cohort moved too (relative effects).
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
Comments