About inu (INU):
inu (INU) is quoted at $0.00005341; market cap is $53.33K and 24-hour volume is $46.75K. Market liquidity is exceptionally active turnover (volume/market cap 87.67%) At high turnover, liquidity is usually ample across top venues..
Market assessment:
Bull score 36/100 suggests weak momentum and limited buying interest with a defensive tone in the current structure..
Windowed performance: 107.30% (24h), 0.00% (7d), 0.00% (30d). The return mix indicates a transitional regime rather than a clean trend.
Short-term swings are pronounced on this snapshot. Risk is assessed as Medium, which implies a mid-risk environment with alternating calm and impulse Volatility can expand quickly when liquidity shifts..
inu (INU) is positioned in the Late phase,
typically associated with distribution pressure and a higher probability of trend exhaustion Expect more variance and quicker sentiment shifts in late regimes..
Token supply structure is not clearly defined in the current data fields.
Conclusion: From a structure view, the setup currently reflects a defensive structure where capital preservation becomes a priority. Update date: 2026-08-09.
YearBull Rank on this page
Newest YearBull Rank value for inu-2: #6297.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank movement (time windows).
Reading rule: lower is better in this ranking.
- 7d window: no reference point available.
- 30d window: no reference point available.
Liquidity read: a steadier line can indicate steadier access. If the line reacts in bursts, watch for calendar-driven liquidity.
Cycle note: phase changes usually leave a footprint in consistency. If the line breaks range, confirm with more than one week.
Risk framing: short bursts do not always translate into durable placement. If the last week is quiet, the current rank is usually easier to trust.
Market structure: fragmentation can make rank more reactive. If the line range widens, access or routing may be changing.
Practical note: use 30d for context and 7d for current pressure.
YearBull Rank is a relative ranking on YearBull designed to compare coins on a common scale and time window. Treat it as a directional context tool rather than a standalone verdict.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
Comments