Kelp DAO Restaked ETH (RSETH)

Overview

Kelp DAO Restaked ETH (RSETH) market snapshot: Price $2,584.60, market capitalization $942.34M, and reported 24-hour volume $7.81K. Inclusive source market cap rank #106 · market dominance 0.05%.

Trading activity: Reported 24-hour volume equals 0.00% of market capitalization. The local markets snapshot lists Fluid (Ethereum), Uniswap V3 (Arbitrum One) and Uniswap V4 (Ethereum) among venues with observed trading activity.

YearBull indicators: YearBull Rank #3,156. Bull Score 57/100. YB Market Risk Low. This relative market-volatility label is not an investment-safety assessment. Cycle Early. Observed price change: 24h 0.61% · 7d -1.61% · 30d -9.51%.

Values are descriptive and should be read together rather than as a price forecast. Read the YearBull methodology. Snapshot date: 2026-10-23. Data history: 41 daily observations available in the latest 90-day window.

Methodology responsibility: YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher. This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.

What is Kelp DAO Restaked ETH (RSETH)?

YearBull Project Summary: Kelp DAO Restaked ETH is a liquid restaking token built around Ethereum's restaking model. It represents ETH that has been staked and then restaked through an additional coordination layer, with the goal of keeping capital productive across multiple security contexts.

Source description

“rsETH is a Liquid Restaked Token (LRT) issued by Kelp DAO designed to offer liquidity to illiquid assets deposited into restaking platforms, such as EigenLayer. It aims to address the risks and challenges posed by the current offering of restaking”

This source-supplied description may contain old, promotional, or unverified claims and is not YearBull editorial analysis.

Kelp DAO Restaked ETH (RSETH) project facts

  • Source tags: Liquid Staking Tokens, Ethereum Ecosystem, Restaking, Liquid Restaking Tokens, Liquid Staked ETH, Liquid Staking
  • Recorded networks: Ethereum

Official links and contract records appear in Key Facts. Project details can change, so verify current information with the project.

Kelp DAO Restaked ETH metric comparison

This comparison is a stored snapshot generated 2026-10-21 06:30 UTC from 75 daily observations available from 2025-12-19 through 2026-10-21. It is separate from the latest analytical cards above. Percentiles compare the snapshot value with that day's analytical universe; a higher percentile means a larger observed value, not necessarily a better investment characteristic.

MetricSnapshot30d before90d beforeChange vs 30dUniverse percentile
Price$2,639$2,959$2,366-10.8%n/a
Market cap$973.55M$1.17B$1.37B-17.0%P99.1
YearBull Rank#3,398#9,126#3,472Improved 5,728P60.0
Bull Score55/10053/10031/100+2.0 ptsP63.0
Turnover0.00%0.00%0.06%0.0 ptsP1.5
YB Market RiskLowLowLowUnchangedn/a
CycleEarlyMidEarlyMid → Earlyn/a

Median absolute daily movement 1.16%; distance from the highest local daily price -26.1%; circulating supply change +5.6%. These measurements are descriptive and do not predict future direction.

Editorial research. Identity, project facts, sources, and risks below belong to the dated editorial review. The live analytical snapshot above may be newer and is generated separately from stored market data.

Asset Analysis: Kelp DAO Restaked ETH

Kelp DAO Restaked ETH is a liquid restaking token built around Ethereum’s restaking model. It represents ETH that has been staked and then restaked through an additional coordination layer, with the goal of keeping capital productive across multiple security contexts.

The core idea is efficiency. Instead of ETH securing only the base Ethereum network, it is reused to support additional services while remaining liquid through a transferable token.

From experience watching restaking concepts move from theory into practice, assets like this tend to attract attention quickly because they promise more output from the same collateral. The trade-off is complexity, which often matters more over time than initial yield appeal.

What Kelp DAO Restaked ETH is not

This asset is not native ETH. Holding it means accepting abstraction layers between the user and Ethereum’s base staking mechanism.

It is also not simple liquid staking. Restaking introduces additional dependencies beyond validator performance, including middleware coordination and service-level guarantees.

And it is not a finished product. Restaking ecosystems evolve unevenly, and the token’s role can shift as new services are added or removed.

How the restaking structure works

Kelp DAO coordinates ETH restaked through platforms such as EigenLayer and issues a liquid token that reflects this position. Users gain exposure to base staking rewards plus whatever additional compensation restaked services provide.

The hard technical anchor is dependency stacking. Security assumptions extend beyond Ethereum validators to include restaking contracts, service operators, and governance processes.

One pattern that emerges in practice is that layered yield looks stable until one layer misbehaves. When that happens, diagnosing the source of underperformance can be slow and opaque.

Methodology context

This analysis prioritizes structural resilience over advertised returns. The comparative lens used here is outlined in the YearBull methodology.

For Kelp DAO Restaked ETH, the focus is on how multi-layer security assets behave when confidence in one layer is tested.

Momentum and risk interpretation

Within this framework, the asset sits in the lower-mid tier with neutral to weak momentum. Interest is driven by restaking narratives rather than long-established usage.

Risk behavior reflects high volatility sensitivity. Additional yield layers introduce additional failure points, which markets tend to reprice abruptly when uncertainty appears.

Cycle behavior without time anchors

The cycle reading points to early expansion. Restaking remains an exploratory phase, with participation growing faster than long-term evidence.

That aside, early expansion does not guarantee persistence. Some restaking demand is opportunistic and can retreat quickly if incentives compress.

How and where it is actually used

Kelp DAO Restaked ETH is primarily used by participants seeking leveraged security exposure rather than simple staking yield.

From hands-on observation, these users are often more sophisticated but also more sensitive to changing parameters. Capital moves quickly when assumptions change.

Digging deeper, integration depth is still developing. Until restaked assets are broadly accepted as core collateral, usage remains selective.

Who this asset is realistically for

This asset is best suited for advanced Ethereum users comfortable with layered protocol risk and evolving security models.

It is not appropriate for users who want minimal abstraction or who rely on staking as a low-complexity income mechanism.

Structural risks that remain unresolved

The primary risk is compounded dependency. Each additional service restaked on ETH adds coordination and failure risk.

There is also governance uncertainty. Decisions about supported services and risk parameters can materially change outcomes.

Finally, it can be difficult to distinguish durable restaking demand from early experimentation, especially during periods of high enthusiasm.

FAQ

Below are focused answers to common questions about liquid restaked ETH.

Is Kelp DAO Restaked ETH the same as staked ETH?

No. It represents ETH that is both staked and restaked, introducing additional layers of dependency.

Does it earn more than regular staking?

It is designed to capture additional rewards, but those come with additional risk and variability.

What happens if a restaked service fails?

Outcomes depend on the service design and governance decisions, which may affect returns.

Can it be easily converted back to ETH?

Conversion depends on protocol mechanics and liquidity conditions.

Why would users choose restaking?

To increase capital efficiency by reusing ETH security across multiple contexts.

Data Sources

Public market data cross-verified against the sources above using YearBull’s internal snapshot system.

Disclaimer

This analysis is intended to explain structure and trade-offs, not to advocate participation or predict outcomes.

YearBull Rank context

Most recent YearBull Rank reading for kelp-dao-restaked-eth is #3156.

Rank timeline (last 365 days)

Rank change (nearest points).

Reading rule: smaller rank numbers are better.

  • 7d window (2026-10-16): #3262 → #3156 (up by 106).
  • 30d window (2026-09-23): #7637 → #3156 (up by 4481).

YearBull Rank is a relative ranking on YearBull designed to compare coins on a common scale and time window. A smaller rank number indicates a stronger position at that moment.

Route context: If rank moves sharply, it may reflect venue mix changes rather than fundamentals.

Risk view: If the last month is chaotic, widen the lookback before concluding.

Cycle view: Compare the 30d move with the 7d move to see if momentum is accelerating or fading.

Liquidity view: If the curve jumps, check whether the cohort moved too (relative effects).

Editorial note: This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of Alan Zelvin, Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher. The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards. Methodology · Editorial Policy
Research context

Related research and comparable assets

All hubs →

Similar coins

Popular by YearBull Rank

Kelp DAO Restaked ETH (RSETH) Markets

Stored venue snapshot. Markets last checked: 2026-10-17. Next refresh window: around 2026-10-24. Venue listings and volumes are stored snapshots, not live quotes.
Exchange Top Pair Stored 24h volume (snapshot) Trust Rank
Fluid (Ethereum) RSETH/ETH $124.07K #192
Uniswap V3 (Arbitrum One) RSETH/WETH $166 #199
Uniswap V4 (Ethereum) RSETH/ETH $83 #173
Fluid (Arbitrum) RSETH/ETH $42 #218
Camelot V3 RSETH/WETH $17 #263

Listings are ordered by reported snapshot volume. Trust Rank is an external venue-quality indicator; it is not an endorsement or a solvency guarantee.