Trading activity:
Reported 24-hour volume equals 96.29% of market capitalization. The local markets snapshot lists Biconomy.com among venues with observed trading activity.
YearBull indicators:
YearBull Rank #1,175. Bull Score 54/100.
YB Market Risk Low. This relative market-volatility label is not an investment-safety assessment.
Cycle Early. Observed price change: 24h 5.04% · 7d 1.64% · 30d -15.74%.
Values are descriptive and should be read together rather than as a price forecast.
Read the YearBull methodology.
Snapshot date: 2026-10-27.Data history: 45 daily observations available in the latest 90-day window.
Methodology responsibility:
YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by
Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher.
This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.
What is Layerzero Bridged Swell (SWELL)?
Source description
“Swell DAO, a Decentralized Autonomous Organisation, is on a mission to transform the landscape of liquid restaking. The DAO achieves this by promoting inclusivity and accessibility, thereby empowering a wider spectrum of participants in the DeFi sector. With the SWELL governance token, the DAO maintains the Swell protocol by conducting key decision-making processes such as setting fees, appointing delegates, managing proposals, deciding on Layer 2 upgrades, determining AVS inclusion, and managing incentives and grants. Service fees collected by the DAO are channelled towards research, development, and protocol enhancement.”
This source-supplied description may contain old, promotional, or unverified claims and is not YearBull editorial analysis.
Official links and contract records appear in Key Facts. Project details can change, so verify current information with the project.
Layerzero Bridged Swell (SWELL) FAQ
How does SWELL participate in Swell DAO governance?
SWELL functions as the governance token for Swell DAO, which the project presents as a decentralised autonomous organisation focused on liquid restaking. Token-based governance covers protocol decisions rather than serving solely as a transactional asset. The DAO uses this process to coordinate changes affecting fees, delegates, proposals, upgrades, validator-service inclusion, incentives, and grants.
What protocol decisions can Swell DAO make through SWELL governance?
The project states that SWELL governance can address several operational areas: setting service fees, appointing delegates, managing proposals, deciding on Layer 2 upgrades, determining which actively validated services are included, and allocating incentives and grants. These functions position the token within the protocol’s decision-making framework, although the project does not specify voting thresholds or execution procedures here.
How does Swell DAO approach Layer 2 upgrades and AVS inclusion?
Swell DAO’s stated governance scope includes decisions about Layer 2 upgrades and the inclusion of AVSs, or actively validated services. This gives governance a role in determining how the protocol evolves across scaling infrastructure and restaking-related services. The project does not specify the technical criteria, review process, or voting requirements used for either type of decision.
How are service fees intended to support the Swell protocol?
The project says that service fees collected by Swell DAO are directed toward research, development, and protocol enhancement. This presents fee revenue as a funding mechanism for ongoing improvement rather than an end in itself. The project does not specify the fee rates, distribution schedule, accounting process, or precise categories of work that qualify for funding.
Who is Swell’s liquid-restaking governance model intended to include?
Swell DAO positions its liquid-restaking mission around broader participation in decentralised finance. It says the model promotes inclusivity and accessibility, with the aim of empowering a wider range of participants. These are stated objectives rather than measurable guarantees, and the project does not detail eligibility rules, participation requirements, or specific programmes supporting that wider access.
Layerzero Bridged Swell metric comparison
This comparison is a stored snapshot generated 2026-10-23 06:31 UTC from 73 daily observations available from 2025-12-30 through 2026-10-23. It is separate from the latest analytical cards above. Percentiles compare the snapshot value with that day's analytical universe; a higher percentile means a larger observed value, not necessarily a better investment characteristic.
Metric
Snapshot
30d before
90d before
Change vs 30d
Universe percentile
Price
$0.00069512
$0.00089872
$0.001307
-22.7%
n/a
Market cap
$50.6K
$65.4K
$1.03M
-22.7%
P23.1
YearBull Rank
#1,787
#5,134
#2,501
Improved 3,347
P79.1
Bull Score
53/100
68/100
36/100
-15.0 pts
P57.0
Turnover
50.42%
109.64%
4.13%
-59.2 pts
P95.2
YB Market Risk
Low
Low
Low
Unchanged
n/a
Cycle
Early
Mid
Early
Mid → Early
n/a
Median absolute daily movement 2.29%; distance from the highest local daily price -64.5%; circulating supply change -90.8%. These measurements are descriptive and do not predict future direction.
YearBull Rank context
YearBull Rank now for layerzero-bridged-swell: #1175.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (reference points).
Reading rule: lower numbers mean higher placement.
7d window (2026-10-20): #1584 → #1175 (up by 409).
30d window (2026-09-27): #5894 → #1175 (up by 4719).
Route context: If rank moves sharply, it may reflect venue mix changes rather than fundamentals.
Risk placement: If it improves then retraces fast, treat it as rotation pressure.
Cycle angle: Compare the 30d move with the 7d move to see if momentum is accelerating or fading.
Liquidity view: If the line flatlines, the coin may be moving with its liquidity peers.
YearBull Rank is a relative placement score used on YearBull to compare a coin against peers within the same dataset. Lower values mean higher placement in the YearBull ordering.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
Related Research
Continue with contextually connected profiles and category data:
autism analysis - nearby market scale in the current dataset.
Derp analysis - nearby market scale in the current dataset.
Stored venue snapshot. Markets last checked: 2026-07-27. Updated on a rolling basis; no fixed refresh date is promised. Venue listings and volumes are stored snapshots, not live quotes.
