MiL.k (MLK) research overview
MiL.k (MLK) is tracked by YearBull under the source identifier milk-alliance. Source categories place the asset in the AI Cryptocurrencies universe, with additional labels including Retail, BNB Chain Ecosystem, Arbitrum Ecosystem. Category labels describe market context; they do not prove project activity, adoption, or investment quality.
Market structure and supply
Observed market capitalization is about $21.22 million and reported 24 hour volume is about $1.72 million. That volume equals 8.09% of market capitalization in the dated snapshot. Current circulating supply is 572,515,159. The recorded maximum supply is 1,300,000,000. Circulating supply changed +9.7% across the available historical window. Reported volume and supply fields can change through source revisions, issuance, burns, migrations, or venue coverage.
Key risks and limits
Liquidity depth, holder concentration, contract or network controls, token issuance, venue availability, governance, and operational dependencies remain material. Historical metrics describe the available YearBull record; they do not predict future returns. Contract addresses, network support, custody, and venue availability should be verified before use.
Primary sources and review scope
YearBull methodology | Official project website | Technical documentation or whitepaper. Identity, categories, supply, and historical market fields were reviewed from locally stored source records on 2026-09-12. The live analytical snapshot may be newer than this editorial review.
YearBull Rank timeline
YearBull Rank now for milk-alliance: #125.
Rank movement (time windows).
Reading rule: rank #120 sits higher than rank #200.
- 7d window (2026-09-13): #60 → #125 (down by 65).
- 30d window (2026-08-21): #1357 → #125 (up by 1232).
YearBull Rank is a relative ranking on YearBull designed to compare coins on a common scale and time window. Smaller numbers mean the coin sits higher in the YearBull list. It is meant for comparison and tracking, not certainty.
Risk angle: short bursts do not always translate into durable placement. If the curve whipsaws, treat the rank as fragile.
Liquidity read: stable placement often correlates with stable participation. If the line drifts, liquidity may be gradually shifting.
Cycle placement: phase changes usually leave a footprint in consistency. If 7d and 30d disagree, treat it as a transition window.
Market structure: venue mix can alter rank without changing the narrative. If rank can’t hold gains, it can be concentrated pressure.
