About MullenArmy (MULN):
The latest snapshot lists MullenArmy (MULN) at $0.00003624, with $36.24K market cap and $16 traded over 24h. Liquidity reads as lower turnover intensity (volume/market cap 0.04%) Thin turnover can amplify short-term swings when liquidity thins..
Market assessment:
Bull score 0/100 suggests weak momentum with uneven demand support with a defensive tone in the current structure..
Windowed change reads -0.63% over 24h, -3.12% over 7d, and -19.23% over 30d. The windows align with a downside-biased regime and weaker follow-through.
Near-term volatility appears restrained. YearBull Rank #6,546 - YearBull Rank helps contextualize structural positioning within the broader market snapshot. Risk is assessed as —, which implies conditions are updating.
Supply ceiling details are not provided in the current snapshot.
Conclusion: Conclusion: the market structure currently signals a transitional structure with no dominant directional bias. Update date: 2026-06-25.
YearBull Rank on this page
YearBull Rank now for mullenarmy: #6546.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (reference points).
Reading rule: lower numbers mean higher placement.
- 7d window: no reference point available.
- 30d window: no reference point available.
YearBull Rank is a comparative ordering used on YearBull to place a coin versus others using a consistent set of inputs. A smaller rank number indicates a stronger position at that moment.
Cycle view: If the 7d is weak but 30d is strong, it can be a pullback in an up-phase.
Route context: If rank holds gains, the footprint is likely supporting the move.
Risk context: If it improves then retraces fast, treat it as rotation pressure.
Liquidity framing: If the curve is jagged, widen the window before concluding.
Practical note: stability often signals more than spikes.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
Comments