Trading activity:
Reported 24-hour volume equals 0.52% of market capitalization. The local markets snapshot lists MEXC, CoinEx and Nonkyc.io among venues with observed trading activity.
YearBull indicators:
YearBull Rank #9,065. Bull Score 17/100.
YB Market Risk Low. This relative market-volatility label is not an investment-safety assessment.
Cycle Early. Observed price change: 24h -1.27% · 7d -1.53% · 30d -53.61%.
Values are descriptive and should be read together rather than as a price forecast.
Read the YearBull methodology.
Snapshot date: 2026-10-27.Data history: 90 days available in the latest 90-day window.
Methodology responsibility:
YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by
Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher.
This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.
What is Radiant (RXD)?
Source description
“The Radiant network is a peer-to-peer digital asset system that enables direct exchange of value without going through a central party. A zero compromise blockchain with the inherent parallelism and performance characteristics of an unspent transaction output (UTXO) based architecture and the Turing Complete programming of Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) architectures. This is a breakthrough smart contracting and digital asset system based on SHA512 proof-of-work, designed for extreme throughput and scale.”
This source-supplied description may contain old, promotional, or unverified claims and is not YearBull editorial analysis.
Recorded network: native asset or no separate token platform identified
Official links and contract records appear in Key Facts. Project details can change, so verify current information with the project.
Radiant (RXD) FAQ
How does Radiant present its approach to peer-to-peer value exchange?
Radiant presents itself as a peer-to-peer digital asset system intended to let users exchange value directly, without relying on a central party. This positioning emphasizes direct interaction between participants rather than mediation by a central institution. The project’s stated model describes the network at a high level and does not specify the practical payment flows, settlement rules, or participant requirements involved.
Why does Radiant combine a UTXO-based architecture with EVM-style programming?
The project states that Radiant combines the parallelism and performance characteristics associated with an unspent transaction output, or UTXO, architecture with the Turing-complete programming associated with Ethereum Virtual Machine architectures. Its stated goal is to bring transaction-processing characteristics and flexible smart-contract programming into one blockchain design. The project does not specify the exact execution model or compatibility boundaries between these elements.
What does Radiant mean by describing its blockchain as “zero compromise”?
Radiant uses the phrase “zero compromise” to characterize its intended balance between two design priorities: the performance and parallelism associated with UTXO systems, and the programmable functionality associated with EVM architectures. This is a project positioning claim rather than a measurable conclusion in itself. No detailed benchmarks, trade-off analysis, or technical limits are specified alongside the phrase.
How is SHA512 proof-of-work used in Radiant’s stated design?
Radiant states that its digital asset and smart-contract system is based on SHA512 proof-of-work. In broad terms, this identifies SHA512 as the hashing basis of its proof-of-work approach, where computational work is used as part of network operation. The project does not specify mining requirements, block timing, issuance rules, resistance characteristics, or how consensus responsibilities are distributed.
What scalability objective does Radiant associate with its blockchain architecture?
Radiant positions its architecture as being designed for extreme throughput and scale. The stated rationale connects this objective with the parallelism and performance characteristics of a UTXO-based structure, alongside programmable smart-contract functionality. These are intended design goals, not independently established performance results. Specific throughput figures, scaling methods, workload assumptions, and operating limits are not specified.
Radiant metric comparison
This comparison is a stored snapshot generated 2026-10-23 06:31 UTC from 293 daily observations available from 2025-12-30 through 2026-10-23. It is separate from the latest analytical cards above. Percentiles compare the snapshot value with that day's analytical universe; a higher percentile means a larger observed value, not necessarily a better investment characteristic.
Metric
Snapshot
30d before
90d before
Change vs 30d
Universe percentile
Price
$0.00002724
$0.00003797
$0.00007196
-28.3%
n/a
Market cap
$415.6K
$585.2K
$1.11M
-29.0%
P55.1
YearBull Rank
#6,828
#4,974
#1,298
Lower by 1,854
P20.1
Bull Score
29/100
55/100
50/100
-26.0 pts
P21.3
Turnover
0.63%
0.41%
5.07%
+0.2 pts
P51.9
YB Market Risk
Low
Low
Low
Unchanged
n/a
Cycle
Early
Early
Early
Unchanged
n/a
Median absolute daily movement 3.15%; distance from the highest local daily price -79.7%; circulating supply change +1.3%. These measurements are descriptive and do not predict future direction.
YearBull Rank update
Latest available YearBull Rank for radiant: #9065.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (nearest points).
Reading rule: lower is better in this ranking.
7d window (2026-10-21): #7501 → #9065 (down by 1564).
30d window (2026-09-28): #2087 → #9065 (down by 6978).
YearBull Rank is a comparative ordering used on YearBull to place a coin versus others using a consistent set of inputs. Use it as positioning context over time, not as a promise.
Liquidity read: deep markets usually produce smoother rank paths. If the curve improves but won’t hold, treat it as flow-driven.
Cycle framing: phase changes usually leave a footprint in consistency. If 7d and 30d disagree, treat it as a transition window.
Risk profile: a calm line with small steps can be healthier than spikes. If the curve whipsaws, treat the rank as fragile.
Exchange footprint: fragmentation can make rank more reactive. If the line range widens, access or routing may be changing.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
Related Research
Continue with contextually connected profiles and category data:
Stored venue snapshot. Markets last checked: 2026-07-26. Updated on a rolling basis; no fixed refresh date is promised. Venue listings and volumes are stored snapshots, not live quotes.
