Shardeum (SHM, Asset D27FF7)

Overview

Shardeum (SHM, Asset D27FF7) market snapshot: Price $0.00003771, market capitalization $642.03K, and reported 24-hour volume $137.73K.

Trading activity: Reported 24-hour volume equals 21.45% of market capitalization. The local markets snapshot lists KuCoin, MEXC and CoinW among venues with observed trading activity.

YearBull indicators: YearBull Rank #1,603. Bull Score 47/100. YB Market Risk Low. This relative market-volatility label is not an investment-safety assessment. Cycle Early. Observed price change: 24h -0.05% · 7d -0.58% · 30d 3.68%.

Values are descriptive and should be read together rather than as a price forecast. Read the YearBull methodology. Snapshot date: 2026-09-26. Data history: 90 days available in the latest 90-day window.

Methodology responsibility: YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher. This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.

What is Shardeum (SHM, Asset D27FF7)?

YearBull Project Summary: The review below maps the available evidence for Shardeum across project scope, mechanism, token role and operational status. Fast-changing market, supply and contract details are kept outside the factual record unless a dated source supports them. This structure is designed to keep entity-specific evidence, dated limitations and practical verification needs visible rather than hiding them behind generic market language.

Official links and contract records appear in Key Facts. Project details can change, so verify current information with the project.

Shardeum (SHM, Asset D27FF7) FAQ

How does Shardeum describe its primary role?

Shardeum is described in the reviewed project material through its documented purpose and operating model. The relevant evidence records: Official FAQ and whitepaper define SHM utility. Readers should confirm the current official interface and contract details, because a project description alone does not establish live availability, liquidity or suitability.

Which mechanism should readers verify before using Shardeum?

The dossier identifies this documented mechanism: Current technical whitepaper publishes 249M initial supply and allocation. Before a transaction, users should verify the active chain, contract, permissions and withdrawal or settlement conditions. Those practical details can differ across deployments and may change after the source material was reviewed.

Which information remains unresolved for Shardeum?

This editorial profile reports only the facts tied to the reviewed source set. Current supply, token allocations, metrics, contract status, integrations and risk parameters should be checked against fresh official disclosures or on-chain records where relevant. The documented project design should not be treated as a guarantee of performance or outcome.

Shardeum metric comparison

This comparison is a stored snapshot generated 2026-09-26 07:56 UTC from 206 daily observations available from 2026-03-05 through 2026-09-26. It is separate from the latest analytical cards above. Percentiles compare the snapshot value with that day's analytical universe; a higher percentile means a larger observed value, not necessarily a better investment characteristic.

MetricSnapshot30d before90d beforeChange vs 30dUniverse percentile
Price$0.00003769$0.00003637$0.0000354+3.6%n/a
Market cap$641.7K$619.1K$457.6K+3.6%P61.0
YearBull Rank#1,460#2,149#1,099Improved 689P84.3
Bull Score49/10027/10049/100+22.0 ptsP50.6
Turnover18.41%16.91%20.38%+1.5 ptsP88.4
YB Market RiskLowLowLowUnchangedn/a
CycleEarlyEarlyEarlyUnchangedn/a

Median absolute daily movement 0.67%; distance from the highest local daily price -57.2%; circulating supply change +0.0%. These measurements are descriptive and do not predict future direction.

Editorial research. Identity, project facts, sources, and risks below belong to the dated editorial review. The live analytical snapshot above may be newer and is generated separately from stored market data.

Shardeum (SHM): project purpose, mechanism and token context

The review below maps the available evidence for Shardeum across project scope, mechanism, token role and operational status. Fast-changing market, supply and contract details are kept outside the factual record unless a dated source supports them. This structure is designed to keep entity-specific evidence, dated limitations and practical verification needs visible rather than hiding them behind generic market language.

Documented scope

For the project-level scope, the available sources state: Official FAQ and whitepaper define SHM utility. That evidence helps define Shardeum, while leaving price, adoption and present operating scale outside the conclusion. The description is retained as a sourced project claim and not promoted into a general assessment of quality.

The operating description is more specific on one point: Current technical whitepaper publishes 249M initial supply and allocation. Its present implementation still needs a current check because technical and product terms are mutable. Operational status is treated separately from design so an older specification is not presented as proof of a live feature.

Operating model

Within the documented model, the following detail is relevant: Official site displays network and community metrics. It should not be extended into claims about rewards, liquidity or legal rights that the source does not establish. This protects the distinction between how a system is described and what a user can enforce or execute today.

The reviewed sources add this identity-relevant detail: EVM-compatible Layer 1 designed for low fees, fast finality, scalability, smart contracts and real-world asset tokenization. Before using Shardeum, compare the current official interface and contract rather than relying on the name or ticker alone. Contract verification should include the full address, network and official destination rather than a shortened ticker comparison.

Token design and utility

On token role or economic design, the sources report: Shardeum uses dynamic state sharding and validator rotation so transactions can be processed in parallel; SHM pays gas, secures validators through staking and rewards network participation. Any missing supply, allocation, emission, vesting or burn figure remains unresolved rather than being inferred. Token economics can change through governance, migrations or revised disclosures, so old parameters are not silently carried forward.

The source material further notes: Documented token utility: Gas fees; Validator staking and delegation; Network security; Ecosystem and community rewards. This is useful technical context, but permissions, counterparties, oracles, bridges, custody and withdrawal conditions still require operational review. Each dependency can change the practical risk even when the high-level project description remains the same.

Identity and deployment checks

The evidence set contains one additional project-specific point: Documented tokenomics: Initial supply 249,000,000 SHM under current technical whitepaper; Sale 36.72%, team 30.6%, foundation 22.44%, ecosystem/airdrops 10.23%; Dynamic validator issuance; 100% of transaction fees burned according to technical whitepaper. It is presented as documented context, not as a recommendation or prediction. This attribution boundary prevents promotional or forward-looking language from becoming an unqualified YearBull conclusion.

For a present-day check, the relevant supported fact is: Official FAQ and whitepaper define SHM utility. Readers should defer to a newer authoritative record if Shardeum has changed its deployment or terms. A newer primary source should be used when it conflicts with this dated evidence or identifies a replacement deployment.

Evidence limits and open questions

The available documentation supports a description of intended scope, not a complete current-state audit. It records: Current technical whitepaper publishes 249M initial supply and allocation. Live market metrics and operational availability are evaluated separately. Leaving a field unresolved is preferable to publishing a plausible but unsupported completion.

Finally, the evidence record notes: Official site displays network and community metrics. Before use, confirm the current identity, chain and contract details, then review the project’s latest risk and legal disclosures. That approach is especially important for assets involving custody, lending, bridges, tokenized representations or other external dependencies. Readers should use the cited documentation as a starting point and check the current official record before taking action.

Key takeaways

  • Official FAQ and whitepaper define SHM utility.
  • Current technical whitepaper publishes 249M initial supply and allocation.
  • Official site displays network and community metrics.
  • EVM-compatible Layer 1 designed for low fees, fast finality, scalability, smart contracts and real-world asset tokenization.
  • Shardeum uses dynamic state sharding and validator rotation so transactions can be processed in parallel; SHM pays gas, secures validators through staking and rewards network participation.

YearBull Rank timeline

Current YearBull Rank for shardeum-2: #1603.

Rank timeline (last 365 days)

Rank change (daily snapshots).

Reading rule: smaller rank numbers are better.

  • 7d window (2026-09-19): #832 → #1603 (down by 771).
  • 30d window (2026-08-27): #2149 → #1603 (up by 546).

Liquidity read: stable placement often correlates with stable participation. If the curve improves but won’t hold, treat it as flow-driven.

Cycle framing: sideways periods still reshuffle relative placement. If 7d and 30d disagree, treat it as a transition window.

Risk angle: minor drift can still matter at scale. If it moves only on certain days, it can be update cadence.

Exchange footprint: one venue can dominate the profile in short windows. If the line range widens, access or routing may be changing.

YearBull Rank is a relative ranking on YearBull designed to compare coins on a common scale and time window. Smaller numbers mean the coin sits higher in the YearBull list.

Editorial note: This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of Alan Zelvin, Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher. The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards. Methodology · Editorial Policy
Research context

Related research and comparable assets

All hubs →

Similar coins

Cipher (CIPHER) (CIPHER) logoCipher (CIPHER)CIPHER$0.00160539#3,948
ON (ONLIVE) (ONLIVE) logoON (ONLIVE)ONLIVE$0.0002675#4,155

Popular by YearBull Rank

Shardeum Markets

Stored venue snapshot. Markets last checked: 2026-08-14. Updated on a rolling basis; no fixed refresh date is promised. Venue listings and volumes are stored snapshots, not live quotes.
Exchange Top Pair Stored 24h volume (snapshot) Trust Rank
KuCoin SHM/USDT $61.22K #12
MEXC SHM/USDT $27.29K #8
CoinW SHM/USDT $23.70K #24
Gate SHM/USDT $14.29K #5
WazirX SHM/INR $1.75K #327

Listings are ordered by reported snapshot volume. Trust Rank is an external venue-quality indicator; it is not an endorsement or a solvency guarantee.