- TENDIES (TENDIES) research overview
- Historical market behavior
- YearBull metric interpretation
- Market structure and supply
- Key risks and limits
- Primary sources and review scope
- TENDIES Is a Robinhood Chain Meme Token With Limited Documented Utility
- What TENDIES does
- Network and market architecture
- Token role and supply
- Identity and contract verification
- Governance, control, and dependencies
- What the evidence supports—and what it does not
- Key takeaways
- Risks and open questions
- YearBull Rank update
TENDIES (TENDIES) research overview
TENDIES (TENDIES) is tracked by YearBull under the source identifier tendies-2. The stored profile does not yet provide a sufficiently specific sector classification. Category labels describe market context; they do not prove project activity, adoption, or investment quality.
Market structure and supply
Observed market capitalization is about $15.55 million and reported 24 hour volume is about $1.16 million. That volume equals 7.46% of market capitalization in the dated snapshot. Current circulating supply is 1,000,000,000. The recorded maximum supply is 1,000,000,000. Circulating supply changed 0.0% across the available historical window. Reported volume and supply fields can change through source revisions, issuance, burns, migrations, or venue coverage.
Key risks and limits
Liquidity depth, holder concentration, contract or network controls, token issuance, venue availability, governance, and operational dependencies remain material. High YearBull Risk appeared on 19.0% of stored observations. Historical metrics describe the available YearBull record; they do not predict future returns. Contract addresses, network support, custody, and venue availability should be verified before use.
Primary sources and review scope
YearBull methodology. Identity, categories, supply, and historical market fields were reviewed from locally stored source records on 2026-09-12. The live analytical snapshot may be newer than this editorial review.
TENDIES Is a Robinhood Chain Meme Token With Limited Documented Utility
TENDIES is presented as a community meme token on Robinhood Chain rather than as a protocol with documented financial, governance, or application functions. Its main practical questions are token identity, market dependence, holder distribution, and the absence of technical documentation.
What TENDIES does
TENDIES is described by its official website and an exchange listing as a community or meme token built around the idea of “tendies,” a slang term for trading gains. The available project material does not describe lending, staking, payments, application access, revenue sharing, or another protocol function. On the evidence reviewed, the token’s primary role is social participation and speculative trading rather than use inside a broader product.
This distinction matters for newcomers. A meme token can have active markets and a recognizable community without creating demand from an underlying service. TENDIES’ own site calls it a community meme token and states that it makes no promises or guarantees. Those statements are consistent with treating the asset as a culture-led token whose relevance depends heavily on attention, liquidity, and continued participation.
Network and market architecture
The token is identified by OpenSea and LBank as being on Robinhood Chain. The official site directs users to trade through Uniswap on that network, while OpenSea presents a Robinhood Chain token page and LBank identifies a TENDIES/USDT spot market. These venues are access points, not evidence that TENDIES is part of Robinhood Chain’s core protocol or that the chain depends on the token.
The architecture visible to users is therefore comparatively simple: a token contract on Robinhood Chain, wallets that support the network, decentralized-exchange liquidity, and selected centralized or marketplace interfaces. The reviewed materials do not document a custom execution layer, oracle system, bridge design, staking mechanism, or application-specific contracts. Any claim that TENDIES offers more than this basic token-and-market structure would require additional technical documentation or verified contract evidence.
Token role and supply
The token’s stated role is community membership and trading exposure. The official site says there is no team and no supply hoarding, while its market instructions focus on swapping into TENDIES. That is a project-positioning statement, not independent proof about ownership or distribution. No reviewed source establishes holder rights, fee rebates, treasury claims, voting rights, or access to a product.
OpenSea and DeFiLlama both report a total and maximum supply of 1 billion TENDIES, with the full amount shown as circulating. OpenSea also reports more than 21,000 holder addresses at the time of its page capture. These figures describe the records available to those services and should not be read as proof that ownership is evenly distributed; a large address count can coexist with substantial concentration among a smaller number of wallets or liquidity pools.
Identity and contract verification
A material unresolved issue is the contract address. The official TENDIES website displays 0xa3E3112CfA230045AE4818697e00C918Bd3BcE01, while LBank’s listing notice and its linked Robinhood Chain Blockscout page identify 0x45242320DBB855EeA8Fd36804C6487E10E97FCF9. OpenSea also uses the 0x4524… address. The reviewed sources do not explain whether this reflects a migration, a second deployment, a website error, or two unrelated tokens using the same ticker.
Until the discrepancy is resolved by a signed project announcement, a verified deployment record, or matching links from the relevant interfaces, the ticker alone is not a sufficient identity check. This is especially important for assets with short histories and multiple trading venues. The contract address, network, token name, decimals, and liquidity pool should be compared before treating market data from different sources as data for the same asset.
Governance, control, and dependencies
No formal governance process, proposal system, upgrade policy, audit report, public code repository, or named operating organization was identified in the reviewed project materials. The official site instead emphasizes “no team” and community participation. That may be part of the token’s intended identity, but it leaves unresolved who can change the contract, control associated accounts, manage official communications, or respond to a migration or market incident.
TENDIES also depends on infrastructure outside the token’s own branding: Robinhood Chain for settlement, Blockscout for contract records, Uniswap for decentralized trading, OpenSea for marketplace access, and exchange operators such as LBank for centralized liquidity. Availability, wallet support, indexer accuracy, and venue policies can affect the practical ability to trade or verify the asset even if the token contract itself remains deployed.
What the evidence supports—and what it does not
The evidence supports describing TENDIES as a Robinhood Chain community meme token with a reported 1 billion supply and market access through multiple interfaces. It does not support describing TENDIES as a decentralized application, an income-producing asset, a governance token, or a token with independently verified utility. The project’s promotional language should therefore be separated from facts that can be checked on exchange, marketplace, and block-explorer records.
Key takeaways
- TENDIES is presented primarily as a community meme token, not as a documented protocol or application token.
- The reported supply is 1 billion TENDIES, with market data services showing the full supply as circulating.
- The official website and major market references display different contract addresses, creating an unresolved identity risk.
- No formal governance, upgrade policy, audit, or public code repository was identified in the reviewed sources.
- Trading and verification depend on Robinhood Chain, wallet support, decentralized liquidity, indexers, marketplaces, and exchange operators.
Risks and open questions
- Contract-address mismatch: the official website displays 0xa3E3112CfA230045AE4818697e00C918Bd3BcE01, while LBank, OpenSea, and the linked Blockscout record use 0x45242320DBB855EeA8Fd36804C6487E10E97FCF9.
- No reviewed source establishes who controls the contract, whether it is upgradeable, or whether privileged addresses can alter token behavior.
- Meme-token demand may depend mainly on attention, community activity, and available liquidity rather than recurring product use.
- Reported holder counts do not establish an even distribution; concentration and liquidity-pool ownership require direct address-level analysis.
- Venue, wallet, indexer, and Robinhood Chain dependencies may affect access, pricing, and the ability to verify activity.
- The official site’s statement that the token has a 0% tax was not independently confirmed from the contract record reviewed.
YearBull Rank update
Newest YearBull Rank value for tendies-2: #8246.
Rank movement (nearest daily data).
Reading rule: rank #120 sits higher than rank #200.
- 7d window (2026-10-18): #8657 → #8246 (up by 411).
- 30d window (2026-09-25): #8863 → #8246 (up by 617).
YearBull Rank is a relative placement score used on YearBull to compare a coin against peers within the same dataset. It is a context signal for relative placement, not an outcome forecast.
Downside posture: the same move can be stable in one market and fragile in another.
Liquidity context: a quiet tape can still re-rank the pack.
Venue angle: a broader footprint often smooths the rank trajectory.
Market phase: a quick bounce can still be a mean-reversion phase.
Practical note: if you only read one thing, read the slope.
