UNIPCS market snapshot:
Price $0.00018143, market capitalization $181.43K,
and reported 24-hour volume $8.10K.
Trading activity:
Reported 24-hour volume equals 4.46% of market capitalization.
YearBull indicators:
YearBull Rank #7,365. Bull Score 19/100.
YB Market Risk Low. This relative market-volatility label is not an investment-safety assessment.
Cycle Early. Observed price change: 24h -12.26% · 7d -58.92% · 30d -37.58%.
Values are descriptive and should be read together rather than as a price forecast.
Read the YearBull methodology.
Snapshot date: 2026-10-29.
Data history: 53 daily observations available in the latest 90-day window.
Methodology responsibility:
YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by
Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher.
This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.
Unipcs FAQ
How does unipcs say its 4% trade allocation is divided?
The project states that every trade carries a 4% allocation. It says 2.35% is used to burn the day’s best earners, while 1.175% goes directly to unipcs and the remaining 1.175% supports “the book.” These percentages are presented as the project’s internal allocation model, although the mechanics of each destination are not further specified.
What does “the Cut” mean in unipcs’s operating model?
Unipcs says “the Cut” runs nightly at 00:00 UTC. The project presents this event as the point when its daily process takes place, including the stated burning of the day’s best earners. It does not specify how winners are ranked, which transactions are included, or whether the process is automated or manually administered.
How are the day’s best earners treated under unipcs’s model?
According to the project, 2.35% of each trade is allocated to burning the day’s best earners. This indicates a mechanism focused on selected top-performing assets or positions, but unipcs does not define “best earners,” explain how they are measured, or clarify whether the burn affects tokens, balances, or another form of value.
What role does “the book” play in unipcs’s stated structure?
The project says that 1.175% of every trade runs “the book.” The phrase suggests an operating or accounting function within the MADE framework, but unipcs does not explain what the book contains, who controls it, or how funds assigned to it are used. Its precise function therefore remains unspecified.
How does unipcs identify itself within the MADE framework?
Unipcs presents itself as “seat 01 of 21 in the MADE book.” This wording places the asset in a numbered, 21-seat structure associated with mademen.family. The project does not explain how seats are assigned, what rights or responsibilities they carry, or how the other positions relate to unipcs.
YearBull Rank update
Newest YearBull Rank value for unipcs: #7365.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank movement (nearest daily data).
Reading rule: lower numbers mean higher placement.
- 7d window (2026-10-22): #768 → #7365 (down by 6597).
- 30d window (2026-09-29): #5128 → #7365 (down by 2237).
Risk angle: a calm line with small steps can be healthier than spikes. If it moves only on certain days, it can be update cadence.
Orderflow context: stable placement often correlates with stable participation. If the line reacts in bursts, watch for calendar-driven liquidity.
Cycle placement: in rotations, improving rank can happen without price leadership. If 7d and 30d disagree, treat it as a transition window.
Market structure: fragmentation can make rank more reactive. If rank improves slowly, it often reflects broader access or steadier participation.
YearBull Rank is a relative ranking on YearBull designed to compare coins on a common scale and time window. Lower rank numbers correspond to stronger relative placement. It is meant for comparison and tracking, not certainty.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
