Fathom Dollar (FXD): project purpose, mechanism and token context
The review below maps the available evidence for Fathom Dollar across project scope, mechanism, token role and operational status. Fast-changing market, supply and contract details are kept outside the factual record unless a dated source supports them. The result is a project record with explicit limits, not a substitute for checking the latest contract, interface, legal terms and operating conditions.
Purpose in the reviewed sources
The evidence supports this bounded description of Fathom Dollar: Whitepaper parameters include 133.33% launch collateralization/75% LTV, 2% annual stability fee, 0.1% StableSwap fee and a 10% liquidation fee; parameters may be governance-controlled. Any broader claim about current usage, reserves or investment outcome would require separate dated evidence. The description is retained as a sourced project claim and not promoted into a general assessment of quality.
The operating description is more specific on one point: Overcollateralized USD-pegged stablecoin protocol on XDC. Its present implementation still needs a current check because technical and product terms are mutable. A current interface check is still necessary because documentation can outlive the implementation it originally described.
Mechanism described by the project
Within the documented model, the following detail is relevant: Users lock XDC in vaults, mint FXD against collateral, repay debt to burn FXD, and can be liquidated when collateral falls below required ratios; StableSwap and arbitrage support the peg. It should not be extended into claims about rewards, liquidity or legal rights that the source does not establish. Economic rights, if any, depend on the actual contract and governing terms rather than on a general product description.
The reviewed sources add this identity-relevant detail: Documented token utility: FXD is the stablecoin used in the Fathom system.; FTHM is used for governance and staking.. Before using Fathom Dollar, compare the current official interface and contract rather than relying on the name or ticker alone. This identity check is especially important for bridged, wrapped, migrated or reissued assets.
Supply and token context
On token role or economic design, the sources report: Official docs describe vaults, lending, DEX/StableSwap, oracles, liquidations and governance. Any missing supply, allocation, emission, vesting or burn figure remains unresolved rather than being inferred. Where a figure is supplied, its date and measurement basis remain part of the fact and should travel with it.
The reviewed record also preserves this point: not officially confirmed in reviewed sources It does not replace due diligence on smart-contract authority, counterparties, bridges, oracles or access restrictions. The profile keeps those operational questions visible instead of treating the source description as a complete risk review.
Contracts, versions and interfaces
The evidence set contains one additional project-specific point: Whitepaper parameters include 133.33% launch collateralization/75% LTV, 2% annual stability fee, 0.1% StableSwap fee and a 10% liquidation fee; parameters may be governance-controlled. It is presented as documented context, not as a recommendation or prediction. Where external confirmation is absent, the wording remains explicitly tied to the reviewed source record.
For a present-day check, the relevant supported fact is: Overcollateralized USD-pegged stablecoin protocol on XDC. Readers should defer to a newer authoritative record if Fathom Dollar has changed its deployment or terms. The review date is therefore part of the interpretation, not a decorative freshness signal.
What the sources do not establish
The project material is sufficient for this specific point: Users lock XDC in vaults, mint FXD against collateral, repay debt to burn FXD, and can be liquidated when collateral falls below required ratios; StableSwap and arbitrage support the peg. It is not sufficient to fill unrelated gaps in current market, contract or operating data. Explicit gaps tell readers which checks remain necessary and keep the sourced facts distinct from assumptions.
For the last evidence item, the sources state: Documented token utility: FXD is the stablecoin used in the Fathom system.; FTHM is used for governance and staking.. The practical next step is a current check of chain, contract, official interface and material dependencies. The exact checks depend on the asset, but a current primary source and full contract comparison are the minimum identity controls.
Key takeaways
- Whitepaper parameters include 133.33% launch collateralization/75% LTV, 2% annual stability fee, 0.1% StableSwap fee and a 10% liquidation fee; parameters may be governance-controlled.
- Overcollateralized USD-pegged stablecoin protocol on XDC.
- Users lock XDC in vaults, mint FXD against collateral, repay debt to burn FXD, and can be liquidated when collateral falls below required ratios; StableSwap and arbitrage support the peg.
- Documented token utility: FXD is the stablecoin used in the Fathom system.; FTHM is used for governance and staking..
- Official docs describe vaults, lending, DEX/StableSwap, oracles, liquidations and governance.
YearBull Rank on this page
YearBull Rank data is not available at the moment for fathom-dollar.
Rank change (daily snapshots).
Reading rule: smaller rank numbers are better.
- 7d window: current rank not available.
- 30d window: current rank not available.
YearBull Rank is an internal ordering on YearBull that positions a coin relative to the rest of the tracked universe. It is meant for comparison and tracking, not certainty.
Risk angle: minor drift can still matter at scale. If it moves only on certain days, it can be update cadence.
Orderflow context: stable placement often correlates with stable participation. If the curve improves but won’t hold, treat it as flow-driven.
Cycle placement: in rotations, improving rank can happen without price leadership. If the line breaks range, confirm with more than one week.
Exchange footprint: venue mix can alter rank without changing the narrative. If the line range widens, access or routing may be changing.
