- GoPlus Security Overview
- Asset Role and Supply
- Market Structure
- YearBull Perspective
- Key Risks
- Primary Sources and Review Scope
- GoPlus Security: How GPS Fits Into a Decentralized Web3 Security Network
- A security layer between users and blockchains
- How the proposed architecture works
- Operators, data contributors, and SecWare developers
- What GPS is intended to do
- Governance and control of upgrades
- Practical limitations for users and integrators
- Key takeaways
- Risks and open questions
- YearBull Rank timeline
GoPlus Security Overview
GoPlus Security (GPS) is tracked under goplus-security. The local profile associates it with BNB Chain Ecosystem, Base Ecosystem, Cybersecurity, YZi Labs (Prev. Binance Labs) Portfolio. The source profile maps it to base, binance-smart-chain.
Asset Role and Supply
Its role should be evaluated through network or product use, supply design, governance, liquidity, and trading-venue quality. The reviewed record shows circulating supply about 5.84 billion GPS, total supply about 10.00 billion GPS, maximum supply about 10.00 billion GPS. It classifies supply as capped. Supply fields may change through issuance, burns, migrations, or source revisions and should be checked against project records.
Market Structure
At the 2026-09-12 review, the local snapshot placed GoPlus Security at market-cap rank #412, with market capitalization about $57.27 million and reported 24-hour volume of $7.39 million. These values describe observed scale and turnover, not fair value or guaranteed executable liquidity.
YearBull Perspective
The dated snapshot recorded YearBull Rank #3,494, Bull Score 31/100, Risk Low, and Cycle Mid. Rank, Bull, Risk, and Cycle answer different questions and should be read together.
Key Risks
Material risks include market volatility, liquidity deterioration, protocol or governance failure, concentration, and regulatory change. Historical prices, rankings, and classifications do not predict future performance. Verify contract addresses, network support, custody, and venue availability before acting.
Primary Sources and Review Scope
YearBull methodology · Official website · Source repository. Profile and market fields were checked against locally stored source records on 2026-09-12. The live snapshot above may be newer than this editorial review.
GoPlus Security: How GPS Fits Into a Decentralized Web3 Security Network
GoPlus Security combines security intelligence APIs, transaction-screening software, data contributors, and compute operators. GPS is intended to pay for services, secure participation, and give staked holders a role in network governance, but the model still depends on adoption, reliable risk data, and delivery of planned decentralization.
A security layer between users and blockchains
GoPlus Security is building infrastructure intended to detect risks before or during Web3 transactions. Its current documentation describes security intelligence APIs for token contracts, malicious addresses, NFTs, approvals, decentralized applications, phishing sites, signature data, and transaction simulation. Developers and platforms can integrate these services into wallets, decentralized applications, RPC services, and other user-facing systems rather than requiring users to inspect every contract manually.
The project also presents SafeToken Protocol as a separate product line for safer token issuance and liquidity management. Its documented components include open-source token templates and a liquidity-locking tool. This gives GoPlus two related use cases: analyzing assets and transactions that already exist, and providing developers with standardized tools intended to reduce avoidable risks when launching or managing tokens.
How the proposed architecture works
The planned network is organized around a Security Data Layer and a Security Compute Layer. The data layer is intended to collect, verify, and distribute security information through multiple participants. The compute layer is designed to run security tasks across operator nodes, including transaction simulation, wallet-drainer detection, malicious-address checks, signature analysis, and authorization-risk detection.
The GoPlus Security Module, or GSM, is the connection point between integrated applications and the network. According to the project’s architecture description, a wallet, RPC, sequencer, or other integration sends transaction information to GSM; security services then analyze it and return a recommendation. The integration can proceed with the transaction or reject it when the result is considered malicious. This is a screening and interception model, not a guarantee that every scam, exploit, or incorrect classification will be detected.
Operators, data contributors, and SecWare developers
GoPlus describes its security services as modular SecWares. Developers can create specialized security applications, data contributors can supply and verify risk information, and compute operators can run the services that process security tasks. The compute design uses an actively validated services architecture, with an AVS manager responsible for operator registration, result validation, rewards, and possible slashing. The project’s operator guide also documents a practical dependency on infrastructure such as Docker, Ubuntu, Go, and EigenLayer tooling.
This structure is intended to move security decisions away from one centralized service and toward a network of data and compute participants. That remains a project design objective rather than proof that the complete system is already permissionless or independently verifiable in every component. Users and integrators still depend on the quality of the underlying data, the availability of operators, the correctness of the security logic, and the policies used to resolve disagreements.
What GPS is intended to do
GoPlus positions GPS as the economic token for the network rather than merely a representation of the software. The project says users will pay security gas for protected transactions or SecWare services, business customers will pay for security intelligence, and projects may use GPS-related services connected to SafeToken Protocol. Contributors are expected to stake tokens when providing data, operating compute infrastructure, or developing security services, with rewards linked to accepted contributions.
The published token allocation specifies a total supply of 10 billion GPS. The project allocates 60.67% to ecosystem and community growth categories, including community development, ecosystem growth, marketing, airdrops, liquidity, and advisors, while 39.33% is assigned to the team and early backers. The stated team schedule includes a six-month cliff followed by two years of monthly linear vesting; the documentation says full details for some categories would be provided separately.
Governance and control of upgrades
GoPlus describes governance as stake-weighted: users must stake GPS to obtain voting weight, and larger stakes carry greater influence. Contributors may also stake to support their participation, while the governance framework is intended to distribute rewards and impose penalties for poor or malicious performance. The published roadmap lists a governance portal as a planned milestone, so the existence of a documented voting design should not be treated as evidence that every proposed governance function is already mature or fully decentralized.
The token also has a multi-network implementation that deserves separate attention. Binance identified the Base contract as 0x0c1dc73159e30c4b06170f2593d3118968a0dca5 when it announced GPS in March 2025. BscScan’s record for the BNB Smart Chain address 0x9a4a67721573f2c9209dfff972c52be4e3f6642e identifies a TransparentUpgradeableProxy. Users and integrators therefore need to verify the network, contract address, bridge or token relationship, and any upgrade authority before treating Base and BNB Smart Chain representations as interchangeable.
Practical limitations for users and integrators
GoPlus’s value depends on more than the GPS token. Wallets, RPC providers, chains, sequencers, developers, data contributors, and compute operators must integrate or participate for the proposed protection loop to work. A security warning can be useful without being complete, and a transaction-screening layer can introduce false positives, false negatives, latency, or dependence on an operator and data set. The project’s own roadmap says it may be updated as development and testing continue.
Key takeaways
- GoPlus is building security intelligence, transaction screening, token-launch tooling, and a proposed decentralized data-and-compute network.
- GSM is designed to connect wallets, RPCs, sequencers, and other integrations to SecWare security services before transactions settle.
- GPS is intended for security-service fees, contributor staking, rewards, and stake-weighted governance.
- The documented 10 billion GPS supply includes substantial ecosystem, team, and early-backer allocations with vesting and unlock considerations.
- The project’s security claims depend on data quality, operator performance, software integration, and the accuracy of automated risk analysis.
Risks and open questions
- The proposed decentralized architecture may not mean that every security service, data source, or governance process is already permissionless and independently verifiable.
- Security detection can produce false positives or miss novel attacks; users remain responsible for transaction decisions and wallet security.
- GPS utility depends on actual demand for GoPlus services and on adoption by wallets, RPC providers, chains, applications, and developers.
- Token allocation, vesting, marketing distributions, and future unlocks can affect circulating supply and market concentration.
- The BNB Smart Chain record identifies a proxy contract, creating an upgrade-control and contract-verification question distinct from the Base deployment.
- The roadmap is explicitly subject to change, and planned governance or ecosystem features should not be treated as completed functionality.
YearBull Rank timeline
YearBull Rank now for goplus-security: #2350.
Rank change (reference points).
Reading rule: rank #120 sits higher than rank #200.
- 7d window (2026-09-21): #4540 → #2350 (up by 2190).
- 30d window (2026-08-29): #3305 → #2350 (up by 955).
Cycle view: Compare the 30d move with the 7d move to see if momentum is accelerating or fading.
Route context: If rank moves sharply, it may reflect venue mix changes rather than fundamentals.
Risk placement: If the last month is chaotic, widen the lookback before concluding.
Liquidity framing: If the line flatlines, the coin may be moving with its liquidity peers.
YearBull Rank is an internal ordering on YearBull that positions a coin relative to the rest of the tracked universe. It is a context signal for relative placement, not an outcome forecast.

