HitBTC

Trust Rank External venue ranking. It is not calculated by YearBull and is not a solvency guarantee.
#133
24h Volume (BTC)
2,268.11 BTC
Country
British Virgin Islands
Established
2013

HitBTC exchange snapshot

Centralized (CEX). Country British Virgin Islands. Established 2013. Trust Rank 133. Reported 24h volume 2268.11 BTC.

Coverage: 127 active pairs across 93 tradable assets. Top ten pairs share 85.4%. Key pairs include BTC/USDT, ETH/USDT, BTC/USDC, SOL/USDT. Leading pair BTC/USDT. Median spread on leading markets 0.14%. Volume mix: USDT is the largest tracked quote currency at about 88.7% of measured flow. Data scope: 127 tickers observed, with spread readings on 127 markets.

How to read these exchange metrics

Scope: Trust Rank is an external relative position from the locally stored exchange snapshot. It is not calculated by YearBull and is not a guarantee of solvency, custody quality, licensing, customer protection, or future withdrawal access. Coverage counts observed markets, while concentration shows how much measured volume is assigned to the leading pairs. Median spread summarizes the bid ask gap in the observed leading markets; actual execution also depends on order size, depth, location, and market conditions.

Methodology responsibility: YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher. This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.

Figures may change as exchange and ticker snapshots are refreshed. Read the YearBull methodology.

HitBTC liquidity and coverage analysis

The current local dataset contains 127 observed pairs, 93 represented assets, 127 ticker records. The ten leading pairs account for about 85.4% of measured volume, a concentrated distribution. Median spread across the observed leading markets is 0.14%. The local volume series contains 30 points; its first to latest change is -33.7%, with a median observation of 911.91 BTC.

Coverage and reported volume show the scope of observed markets, not custody quality, solvency, regulatory availability, or guaranteed execution. Pair level depth and withdrawal conditions should be checked for the intended transaction.

Exchange Notes

HitBTC exchange research overview

HitBTC is tracked as a centralized exchange under hitbtc. The source profile lists British Virgin Islands as its country or jurisdiction. A founding or launch year of 2013 is recorded. This profile analyzes observed market structure and is not an endorsement.

Coverage and concentration

The dated snapshot contains 127 active pairs, 93 tradable assets, 127 ticker observations. The leading observed pair is BTC/USDT with about 45.5% of measured volume. The ten leading pairs account for about 85.4%, which is concentrated. Median spread across leading observed markets is 0.14%.

Historical volume context

The local series contains 30 observations. First to latest reported volume changed -33.7%; the median was 911.91 BTC, compared with a measured range of 360.41 to 1,356.02 BTC. Reported activity does not by itself establish executable depth for a specific order.

How to evaluate HitBTC

Compare fees, pair level depth, deposits and withdrawals, custody or contract design, account protections, token verification, and local eligibility. At the 2026-09-12 review, the Trust Rank was #162. Trust Rank, coverage, concentration, and spread answer different questions and should be read together.

Key risks and limits

Custody, withdrawal access, counterparty solvency, operational resilience, account security, jurisdiction, and listing standards are material. Trust Rank is not proof of reserves. Terms, interfaces, listed markets, and regulatory availability can change. Verify current conditions directly with the venue.

Primary sources and review scope

YearBull methodology | Official exchange website. Identity and cached market fields were reviewed on 2026-09-12. The live exchange snapshot may be newer than this editorial review.

HitBTC: A Centralized Venue with Concentrated Observed Trading Activity

HitBTC is recorded as a centralized cryptocurrency exchange launched in 2013 and associated with the British Virgin Islands. Its stated proposition emphasizes broad asset access, trading infrastructure and APIs, while the observed market snapshot shows a narrower and highly concentrated active market than its product claims alone suggest.

HitBTC’s stated role and centralized operating model

HitBTC is recorded as a centralized exchange founded in 2013, with the British Virgin Islands listed as its country or jurisdiction. In this model, trading is organized through a venue-operated platform and matching engine rather than directly through a decentralized protocol. That makes the exchange’s operating terms, access rules, account processes and handling of customer activity central to any assessment of how the venue functions.

The venue description presents HitBTC as a platform for trading Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Dogecoin, Monero, USDT and more than 300 cryptocurrencies. It also claims to provide more than 500 instruments, digital-asset deposits and withdrawals without stated limits, and access to its platform technology under the HitBTC trademark subject to its Terms of Service. These are statements about the service offering, not independent findings about availability for every account or jurisdiction.

Trading technology and market-access claims

HitBTC describes its core matching engine as a high-performance system supporting real-time clearing and advanced order-matching algorithms. It also promotes REST and FIX APIs, alongside a rebate system aimed at market makers. Those features indicate a venue proposition directed not only at occasional spot traders but also at participants who connect software to the exchange or seek to provide liquidity.

The same description characterizes the platform as reliable, fault-tolerant and highly available. Those are operational claims that require separate evidence, such as historical uptime records, incident reporting, maintenance procedures and documentation of how interruptions affect orders, balances or withdrawals. The available venue facts do not establish those controls or outcomes.

Observed HitBTC coverage is narrower than the headline inventory

The observed market snapshot contains 127 pairs covering 93 assets and 127 ticker records. BTC, ETH and SOL appear frequently among the represented assets, with BTC/USDT recorded as the leading pair. This measured set is smaller than the description’s references to more than 300 cryptocurrencies and more than 500 instruments, so the two figures should not be treated as equivalent: the description may refer to a broader product inventory, while the snapshot captures a particular set of observed markets.

Pair concentration is pronounced. BTC/USDT accounts for 45.52% of observed activity, and the ten largest pairs together account for 85.45%. That distribution means headline coverage should not be confused with evenly distributed liquidity across all listed markets. Participants evaluating a less prominent asset would need pair-level evidence rather than relying on the venue-wide count.

Spreads and volume history provide a limited market view

The median spread among the top 20 observed pairs was 0.1422%. This offers a useful snapshot of quoted market conditions, but it is not a guaranteed execution cost. Actual outcomes can vary by order size, timing, volatility, order type and the depth available beyond the best displayed prices.

Across 30 recorded volume observations, the median was 911.9074 BTC. The lowest observation was 360.4124 BTC and the highest was 1,356.0199 BTC, while the first-to-latest change was negative 33.74%. These figures show variation over the observation period and a lower latest reading than the starting point, but they do not by themselves verify the quality of the volume, the amount of executable depth or the continuity of activity in individual pairs.

What the centralized structure makes practical

A centralized venue can bring many markets, APIs and order-management tools into one account environment, consistent with HitBTC’s stated focus on matching technology and broad instruments. It also creates practical dependencies on the exchange’s account procedures, service availability, market controls and digital-asset transfer processes. The description states that digital-asset deposits and withdrawals have no limits, but the available facts do not document processing times, network support, review procedures, suspension rules or exceptions to that statement.

The recorded market structure also suggests that venue-wide statistics may be driven heavily by a small number of major pairs. The BTC/USDT share and top-ten concentration are therefore more informative for comparing liquidity distribution than a total asset or instrument count alone. API users and market makers would additionally need to verify rate limits, order semantics, fee and rebate conditions, error handling and the treatment of disconnected orders.

Questions for evaluating HitBTC beyond the snapshot

A fuller review would need current Terms of Service and access conditions, including the jurisdictions served, account verification requirements, withdrawal review powers and circumstances that can restrict activity. It would also need a clear mapping between the claimed inventory and currently accessible markets, with pair-level depth and execution data rather than ticker counts alone.

Operational diligence should examine independently documented uptime, outage history, maintenance notices, security architecture, custody arrangements, asset-liability information and any available audit or assurance work. None of those matters can be inferred from the venue’s technology claims, its recorded Trust Rank of 162 or its observed volume. public materials supports a profile of a centralized exchange with substantial stated breadth and concentrated measured activity, not a conclusion about safety, solvency or regulatory standing.

Key takeaways

  • HitBTC is recorded as a centralized exchange launched in 2013, with the British Virgin Islands listed as its jurisdiction.
  • The venue claims broad cryptocurrency and instrument coverage, advanced matching technology, APIs and a market-maker rebate system.
  • The observed snapshot covered 127 pairs and 93 assets, below the broader inventory described by the venue.
  • BTC/USDT represented 45.52% of observed activity, while the top ten pairs represented 85.45%.
  • The top-20 median spread was 0.1422%, but spreads do not establish execution costs for every order size or market.
  • Thirty volume observations had a median of 911.9074 BTC and a first-to-latest decline of 33.74%.

Risks and unresolved questions

  • The venue’s claims about uptime, fault tolerance, matching performance and reliability are not independently established by the available facts.
  • The description does not document custody arrangements, reserves, solvency, security controls, audits or incident history.
  • The scope, conditions and exceptions attached to the stated absence of digital-asset deposit and withdrawal limits are unresolved.
  • Observed activity is concentrated in a small number of pairs, so broad asset counts may overstate accessible liquidity for smaller markets.
  • Current jurisdictional access, verification procedures, withdrawal reviews, API limits and fee or rebate terms require direct confirmation.

Venue research

Similar exchanges

Compare venue type, local coverage, observed pairs, and Trust Rank context.

All CEX →

Exchange Trade Volume