IceCream AI market snapshot:
Price $0.00170323, market capitalization $1.70M,
and reported 24-hour volume $16.
Trading activity:
Reported 24-hour volume equals 0.00% of market capitalization. The local markets snapshot lists PancakeSwap V3 (BSC) among venues with observed trading activity.
YearBull indicators:
YearBull Rank #4,579. Bull Score 57/100.
YB Market Risk Low. This relative market-volatility label is not an investment-safety assessment.
Cycle Early. Observed price change: 24h 0.00% · 7d 0.00% · 30d -5.48%.
Values are descriptive and should be read together rather than as a price forecast.
Read the YearBull methodology.
Snapshot date: 2026-10-27.Data history: 90 days available in the latest 90-day window.
Methodology responsibility:
YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by
Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher.
This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.
What is IceCream AI (ICECREAM)?
Source description
“IceCream AI is KOL4U's flagship DeFAI protocol, introducing novel AI-governed smart contracts known as Glaze Pools. Glaze Pools evaluate the impact of any given Community Member on community engagement based on their activity on X, and then distribute On-Chain Assets accordingly. By seeding Glaze Pools, Projects can finally offer performance-based incentives at scale to all members of their community --- anyone who drives community engagement can now monetize their AI-evaluated impact, regardless of their follower count on X. IceCream AI is currently live on BNB Chain and Ronin Network, and the ICECREAM token exists only on the BNB Chain.”
This source-supplied description may contain old, promotional, or unverified claims and is not YearBull editorial analysis.
Official links and contract records appear in Key Facts. Project details can change, so verify current information with the project.
IceCream AI (ICECREAM) FAQ
How do IceCream AI’s Glaze Pools assess community contribution?
The project says Glaze Pools use AI-governed smart contracts to evaluate a community member’s impact on engagement. The assessment is based on activity on X, rather than follower count alone. IceCream AI presents this mechanism as a way to connect measurable community participation with the distribution of on-chain assets, although it does not specify the exact evaluation criteria or scoring formula.
What role do Glaze Pools play for projects using IceCream AI?
IceCream AI states that projects can seed Glaze Pools with on-chain assets and use them to offer performance-based incentives. The intended function is to reward community members according to their contribution to engagement. The project positions this as a scalable alternative to relying primarily on audience size, but it does not specify the assets, funding terms, or operational conditions that each participating project must use.
Who is the intended beneficiary of IceCream AI’s incentive model?
The project presents its model as serving community members who actively drive engagement, including participants who may not have large audiences on X. By tying rewards to evaluated activity, IceCream AI says individuals can monetize their contribution based on impact rather than follower count. The project does not define which activities qualify or explain how disputes over attribution would be handled.
Where does IceCream AI operate, and how does the ICECREAM token fit into its deployment?
IceCream AI states that the protocol is live on BNB Chain and Ronin Network, while the ICECREAM token exists only on BNB Chain. This creates a distinction between the protocol’s stated network presence and the token’s stated issuance location. The project does not explain whether Glaze Pools function identically on both networks or how assets and user activity move between them.
What does IceCream AI mean by AI-governed smart contracts?
The project uses the term “AI-governed smart contracts” for Glaze Pools, presenting them as contracts that incorporate AI-based evaluations of community engagement before distributing on-chain assets. This claim describes the intended decision process, but IceCream AI does not specify the underlying models, governance participants, update procedures, or safeguards that control those evaluations.
IceCream AI metric comparison
This comparison is a stored snapshot generated 2026-10-22 06:31 UTC from 292 daily observations available from 2025-12-30 through 2026-10-22. It is separate from the latest analytical cards above. Percentiles compare the snapshot value with that day's analytical universe; a higher percentile means a larger observed value, not necessarily a better investment characteristic.
Metric
Snapshot
30d before
90d before
Change vs 30d
Universe percentile
Price
$0.00170323
$0.00180201
$0.00172537
-5.5%
n/a
Market cap
$1.70M
$1.80M
$1.73M
-5.5%
P70.6
YearBull Rank
n/a
n/a
#720
n/a
n/a
Bull Score
n/a
n/a
80/100
n/a
n/a
Turnover
0.00%
0.00%
0.03%
+0.0 pts
P3.0
YB Market Risk
n/a
n/a
Low
n/a
n/a
Cycle
n/a
n/a
Early
n/a
n/a
Median absolute daily movement 0.79%; distance from the highest local daily price -83.5%; circulating supply change 0.0%. These measurements are descriptive and do not predict future direction.
YearBull Rank overview
Latest available YearBull Rank for icecream-ai: #4579.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (nearest points).
Reading rule: lower numbers mean higher placement.
7d window: no reference point available.
30d window: no reference point available.
Cycle view: If the 7d is weak but 30d is strong, it can be a pullback in an up-phase.
Risk context: If the last month is chaotic, widen the lookback before concluding.
Market access: If rank holds gains, the footprint is likely supporting the move.
Liquidity framing: If the line flatlines, the coin may be moving with its liquidity peers.
YearBull Rank is a comparative ordering used on YearBull to place a coin versus others using a consistent set of inputs. Lower rank numbers indicate stronger placement in the current snapshot. It is meant for comparison and tracking, not certainty.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
Related Research
Continue with contextually connected profiles and category data:
Venue refresh pending. Markets last checked: 2026-07-26. The next refresh is queued in the hourly updater. Venue listings and volumes are stored snapshots, not live quotes.
