P2B

Trust Rank External venue ranking. It is not calculated by YearBull and is not a solvency guarantee.
#42
24h Volume (BTC)
7,167.76 BTC
Country
Lithuania
Established
2018

P2B exchange snapshot

Centralized (CEX). Country Lithuania. Established 2018. Trust Rank 42. Reported 24h volume 7167.76 BTC.

Coverage: 89 active pairs across 55 tradable assets. Top ten pairs share 80.4%. Key pairs include BTC/USDT, BTC/USD, ETH/USDT, BTC/USDC. Leading pair BTC/USDT. Median spread on leading markets 0.02%. Volume mix: USDT is the largest tracked quote currency at about 61.8% of measured flow. Data scope: 89 tickers observed, with spread readings on 89 markets.

How to read these exchange metrics

Scope: Trust Rank is an external relative position from the locally stored exchange snapshot. It is not calculated by YearBull and is not a guarantee of solvency, custody quality, licensing, customer protection, or future withdrawal access. Coverage counts observed markets, while concentration shows how much measured volume is assigned to the leading pairs. Median spread summarizes the bid ask gap in the observed leading markets; actual execution also depends on order size, depth, location, and market conditions.

Methodology responsibility: YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher. This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.

Figures may change as exchange and ticker snapshots are refreshed. Read the YearBull methodology.

P2B liquidity and coverage analysis

The current local dataset contains 89 observed pairs, 55 represented assets, 89 ticker records. The ten leading pairs account for about 80.4% of measured volume, a moderately concentrated distribution. Median spread across the observed leading markets is 0.02%. The local volume series contains 30 points; its first to latest change is -42.9%, with a median observation of 5,418.57 BTC.

Coverage and reported volume show the scope of observed markets, not custody quality, solvency, regulatory availability, or guaranteed execution. Pair level depth and withdrawal conditions should be checked for the intended transaction.

Exchange Notes

P2B Overview

P2B is tracked as a centralized exchange under p2pb2b. The source profile lists Lithuania as its country or jurisdiction. A founding or launch year of 2018 is recorded. This profile describes observed coverage and is not an endorsement.

Coverage and Trading Structure

The reviewed snapshot includes 89 active pairs, 55 tradable assets, 89 ticker observations. The ten leading pairs represented about 80.4% of measured volume; BTC/USDT was the largest observed pair at about 18.4%; median spread across leading markets was 0.02%. Counts and shares depend on available tickers and may not cover every product or jurisdiction.

How to Evaluate P2B

Evaluate executable depth, fees, deposits and withdrawals, custody, account protections, and local eligibility. Reported volume alone does not show how a larger order will execute. Spread, depth, and concentration should be assessed for the exact pair and size.

Key Risks

Custody, withdrawal access, counterparty solvency, resilience, account security, jurisdiction, and listing standards are material for centralized venues. Trust Rank is not proof of reserves or a guarantee. Terms and regulatory availability can change, so confirm current rules directly with the venue.

YearBull Perspective

At the 2026-09-12 review, the Trust Rank was #42. YearBull reads Trust Rank, coverage, concentration, currency mix, and observed spreads as descriptive indicators. None independently establishes solvency, safety, or suitability.

Primary Sources and Review Scope

YearBull methodology · Official exchange website. Identity and cached market fields were reviewed on 2026-09-12. The live snapshot above may be newer.

P2B’s Launchpad Focus Meets a Concentrated 89-Pair Market

P2B is recorded as a Lithuania-based centralized exchange launched in 2018. Its public positioning centers on newly launched tokens, project go-to-market support and launchpad services, while the observed market snapshot shows a relatively concentrated set of trading pairs.

P2B is recorded as a centralized, Lithuania-based exchange

P2B is recorded as a centralized venue with a Lithuania country entry and a 2018 foundation or launch year. That operating model places account access, market operation and the handling of trading activity within an exchange-controlled structure rather than a permissionless protocol. The available facts do not establish its licensing status, custody arrangements, ownership, solvency or security architecture.

The venue description presents P2B as a European crypto platform focused on helping crypto projects reach market. It claims six years of industry experience and says it has supported more than 2,000 project launches. Those are statements made about the venue, not independently verified findings in this profile.

New-token listings and launchpad services define P2B’s stated role

P2B’s positioning is directed at newly launched tokens and the projects behind them. The description says its go-to-market team helps with marketing, promotion and liquidity after listing, and presents the exchange’s launchpad as having extended functionality. It also says the platform does not impose limitations, use a ticket system or hold tokens, although the exact meaning and operating terms of those claims require clarification.

The venue further reports that its launchpads have raised more than $10 million in total, with a top result above $2 million. The description also refers to a Fund of Rising Stars for projects considered to have strong potential. These figures and programs help explain the exchange’s stated commercial niche, but they do not by themselves show project quality, investor outcomes or the durability of post-listing liquidity.

The observed market is broad enough to show variety, but not breadth at scale

The recorded market snapshot contains 89 pairs across 55 assets, with 89 ticker records. That provides a measurable view of the venue’s listed market at the time of observation, while the emphasis on new tokens is consistent with the exchange’s stated launch-oriented role. It is not evidence that every listed asset has sustained liquidity or active participation.

BTC/USDT is the leading pair, accounting for 18.38% of observed pair share. The ten largest pairs together represent 80.4%, indicating that activity is heavily concentrated in a small part of the book set. This concentration matters when assessing how much of the venue’s reported activity is representative of its broader token catalogue.

Pair concentration limits what headline activity can reveal

The median spread among the top 20 pairs was 0.0212% in the recorded snapshot. A narrow median spread can indicate relatively tight quoted markets for the most active pairs at that moment, but it does not describe execution quality across all 89 pairs. It also cannot establish how much size those quotes could absorb, how long they remained available or what slippage a larger order would encounter.

Thirty volume observations were recorded. Median reported volume was 5,752.4739 BTC, with readings ranging from 2,511.5434 BTC to 16,078.6472 BTC. The first-to-latest change was 1.14%. These are measurements of reported activity, not a validation of volume quality, user demand or the exchange’s financial condition. The data also does not identify wash trading, internalized activity or the share attributable to individual pairs.

Security and growth claims need evidence beyond rankings

P2B’s description says the exchange provides high-level security and places in the top 15 of Cer.Live’s security ranking. That should be treated as a promotional claim unless the ranking methodology, date, scope and underlying controls are independently checked. A third-party score, even when accurately reported, would not answer questions about custody, withdrawals, incident response, account protection or asset segregation.

The same description calls P2B a top European platform and says it reached the top three exchanges by growth speed. These are comparative claims without a defined period, benchmark or underlying dataset in the available facts. The recorded Trust Rank of 42 is a catalogued ranking observation, not a safety endorsement and not a substitute for operational due diligence.

Questions for evaluating P2B’s launch and trading model

A reviewer should establish which legal entity operates P2B, what permissions apply in each relevant market and how customers’ assets are held. The launchpad claims also warrant specific documentation: eligibility rules, allocation mechanics, fees, refund treatment, token custody, listing criteria and the meaning of “additional liquidity services.”

For the market data, the key follow-ups are the snapshot date, pair-level volumes, order-book depth, inactive or delisted markets and the methodology used to calculate spreads and volume. Finally, claims about more than 2,000 launches, more than $10 million raised, security rankings and growth should be checked against dated records and clearly defined measurement periods.

Key takeaways

  • P2B is recorded as a centralized exchange founded in 2018 with Lithuania as its recorded country entry.
  • Its stated niche is launch support for new crypto projects, including listings, promotion, launchpads and post-listing liquidity services.
  • The observed market included 89 pairs and 55 assets, but the ten largest pairs accounted for 80.4% of pair share.
  • BTC/USDT led the observed market at 18.38%, while the top-20 median spread was 0.0212%.
  • Reported volume varied substantially across 30 observations; those figures do not establish volume quality or venue safety.
  • Security, growth, fundraising and launch-count claims require dated methodology and primary documentation.

Risks and unresolved questions

  • The venue’s licensing status, applicable jurisdictions, custody design, asset segregation and solvency are not established.
  • Market concentration may make the broader token catalogue less liquid than the leading pairs suggest.
  • The observed spread and volume figures do not show order-book depth, execution slippage, data quality or possible wash trading.
  • The terms, eligibility rules, fees and allocation mechanics for launchpad and liquidity services are unspecified.
  • Claims about security ranking, project launches, fundraising totals and growth lack defined measurement periods and independent verification.

Venue research

Similar exchanges

Compare venue type, local coverage, observed pairs, and Trust Rank context.

All CEX →

Exchange Trade Volume