Trading activity:
Reported 24-hour volume equals 0.32% of market capitalization. The local markets snapshot lists Uniswap V3 (Base) among venues with observed trading activity.
YearBull indicators:
YearBull Rank #6,403. Bull Score 51/100.
YB Market Risk Low. This relative market-volatility label is not an investment-safety assessment.
Cycle Early. Observed price change: 24h -4.03% · 7d -7.20% · 30d -21.45%.
Values are descriptive and should be read together rather than as a price forecast.
Read the YearBull methodology.
Snapshot date: 2026-10-27.Data history: 90 days available in the latest 90-day window.
Methodology responsibility:
YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by
Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher.
This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.
What is Rage Protocol (RAGE)?
Source description
“RAGE Protocol is a treasury-backed token system inspired by MicroStrategy's Bitcoin strategy. RAGE tokens are backed by two deflationary assets: HESTIA (80%, paired to USDC, 45% supply burned) and ULTRAROUND (20%, paired to ETH, 17% supply burned). These backing assets are wrapped as yield-generating pTokens through Peapods Finance. The protocol creates a self-reinforcing flywheel: when RAGE trades at a premium, arbitrageurs must invest through the protocol to profit, which automatically buys the underlying assets and increases backing value. Combined with delayed claims, investment bonuses, claim exit fees, and accretive dilution, the system systematically increases the backing per RAGE token over time while maintaining market premiums.”
This source-supplied description may contain old, promotional, or unverified claims and is not YearBull editorial analysis.
Official links and contract records appear in Key Facts. Project details can change, so verify current information with the project.
Rage Protocol (RAGE) FAQ
How are HESTIA and ULTRAROUND used to back RAGE?
The project states that RAGE is backed by two deflationary assets: HESTIA, representing 80% of the backing and paired with USDC, and ULTRAROUND, representing 20% and paired with ETH. It also says that 45% of HESTIA’s supply and 17% of ULTRAROUND’s supply have been burned. These proportions and burn figures are presented as part of the protocol’s backing model.
What role do Peapods Finance pTokens play in the RAGE system?
RAGE’s backing assets are presented as yield-generating pTokens through Peapods Finance. In the project’s model, wrapping HESTIA and ULTRAROUND this way connects the backing assets to a yield-generating structure while preserving their role within the treasury-backed system. The project does not specify the precise yield mechanism, distribution terms, or risks associated with these pTokens.
How is the protocol’s premium-based flywheel supposed to work?
The project says that when RAGE trades above its backing value, arbitrageurs can seek to profit by investing through the protocol. Their activity is described as automatically purchasing the underlying assets, which would increase the value supporting the system. This is presented as a self-reinforcing flywheel: a market premium attracts protocol-directed investment, and that investment is intended to strengthen backing per RAGE token.
What mechanisms does RAGE use to increase backing per token?
The project identifies several mechanisms intended to raise backing per RAGE token over time: delayed claims, investment bonuses, claim exit fees, and accretive dilution. Together, these are presented as ways to retain or add value to the system rather than allowing every claim to immediately reduce backing. The exact timing, fee rates, bonus calculations, and dilution rules are not specified.
Why does the project compare RAGE with MicroStrategy’s Bitcoin strategy?
RAGE Protocol presents itself as a treasury-backed token system inspired by MicroStrategy’s strategy of building exposure through a treasury. The comparison concerns the broad treasury-accumulation concept, while RAGE’s stated structure uses HESTIA and ULTRAROUND as backing assets and wraps them into yield-generating pTokens. This positioning is an analogy made by the project, not a claim that the systems are identical.
Rage Protocol metric comparison
This comparison is a stored snapshot generated 2026-10-24 06:30 UTC from 283 daily observations available from 2025-12-30 through 2026-10-24. It is separate from the latest analytical cards above. Percentiles compare the snapshot value with that day's analytical universe; a higher percentile means a larger observed value, not necessarily a better investment characteristic.
Metric
Snapshot
30d before
90d before
Change vs 30d
Universe percentile
Price
$6.40
$7.90
$5.07
-19.0%
n/a
Market cap
$486.0K
$570.9K
$366.9K
-14.9%
P56.7
YearBull Rank
#5,067
#1,273
#2,921
Lower by 3,794
P39.9
Bull Score
53/100
81/100
49/100
-28.0 pts
P56.7
Turnover
0.02%
0.04%
0.01%
0.0 pts
P17.3
YB Market Risk
Low
Low
Low
Unchanged
n/a
Cycle
Early
Early
Early
Unchanged
n/a
Median absolute daily movement 1.36%; distance from the highest local daily price -26.0%; circulating supply change +61.9%. These measurements are descriptive and do not predict future direction.
YearBull Rank context
Latest available YearBull Rank for rage-protocol: #6403.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (reference points).
Reading rule: smaller rank numbers are better.
7d window (2026-10-20): #5549 → #6403 (down by 854).
30d window (2026-09-27): #3733 → #6403 (down by 2670).
Rotation context: If the 7d is weak but 30d is strong, it can be a pullback in an up-phase.
Risk view: Read it as "how stable is the position" rather than "how exciting is today".
Execution context: If rank moves sharply, it may reflect venue mix changes rather than fundamentals.
Liquidity framing: If the line flatlines, the coin may be moving with its liquidity peers.
YearBull Rank is a relative placement score used on YearBull to compare a coin against peers within the same dataset. It is best read as relative context across time windows, not as a guarantee.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
Related Research
Continue with contextually connected profiles and category data:
Stored venue snapshot. Markets last checked: 2026-07-27. Updated on a rolling basis; no fixed refresh date is promised. Venue listings and volumes are stored snapshots, not live quotes.
