About 屎壳郎 (Dung Beetle) (屎壳郎):
With 屎壳郎 (Dung Beetle) (屎壳郎) near $0.010684, market cap is $6.85M and 24h traded value is around $36.54K. Liquidity reads as muted turnover compared with market size (volume/market cap 0.53%) Turnover at this level can make fills more venue-dependent..
Market assessment:
Bull score 33/100 suggests weak momentum with a defensive tone with less supportive flow conditions in the near term..
Snapshot returns: 24h -4.46% · 7d -29.03% · 30d -70.51%. Returns remain pressured across major windows. Near-term volatility looks contained on this snapshot. YearBull Rank #5,608 - YearBull Rank is a context label for structure, not a measure of brand strength. Risk is assessed as Low, which implies a calmer regime with more orderly price action Conditions can change quickly if participation or liquidity shifts..
屎壳郎 (Dung Beetle) (屎壳郎) is positioned in the Early phase,
typically associated with early-cycle setup where directional bias is still forming Liquidity can improve as the cycle matures..
Tokenomics snapshot does not specify a max supply ceiling.
Conclusion: In summary, current conditions suggest a transitional structure with no dominant directional bias. Update date: 2026-08-07.
7d window (2026-07-31): #5976 → #5608 (up by 368).
30d window (2026-07-08): #6310 → #5608 (up by 702).
YearBull Rank is a comparative index on YearBull that helps contextualize a coin’s position versus others over time. It is best read as relative context across time windows, not as a guarantee.
Route context: If rank moves sharply, it may reflect venue mix changes rather than fundamentals.
Risk placement: If the last month is chaotic, widen the lookback before concluding.
Cycle angle: Compare the 30d move with the 7d move to see if momentum is accelerating or fading.
Liquidity framing: If the line flatlines, the coin may be moving with its liquidity peers.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
We use cookies and similar technologies to improve site functionality, analyze usage, and enhance user experience.
By continuing to use YearBull, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our
Privacy Policy.
Comments