Trading activity:
Reported 24-hour volume equals 0.01% of market capitalization.
YearBull indicators:
YearBull Rank #4,409. Bull Score 62/100.
YB Market Risk Low. This relative market-volatility label is not an investment-safety assessment.
Cycle Early. Observed price change: 24h 0.00% · 7d 0.00% · 30d -15.30%.
Values are descriptive and should be read together rather than as a price forecast.
Read the YearBull methodology.
Snapshot date: 2026-10-27.Data history: 90 days available in the latest 90-day window.
Methodology responsibility:
YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by
Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher.
This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.
What is Zenko Protocol (ZENKO)?
Source description
“Zenko is a real-world engagement protocol that connects brand campaigns with on-chain incentives. Users earn $ZENKO tokens by completing actions like learning, moving, or playing. Brands fund these actions to reduce cost-per-lead and generate impact. All rewards are backed by real demand, with token buybacks and verified good (e.g. trees planted, carbon offset) recorded on-chain. • Yield machine powered by ad budgets – brands fund the system, not holders. • 100% fee loop – 50% auto buybacks, 50% to holder-voted environmental and social impact projects. • One token, multi-dApp demand – Zenko powers Learn-to-Earn, Move-to-Earn, Shop-to-Earn, and Play-to-Earn experiences. • Real-world flywheel – Brands cut CPL by +35%, create measurable ESG outcomes, and vacuum tokens off-market. • Already live with enterprise clients – including Fortune 500 brands and pro sports teams.”
This source-supplied description may contain old, promotional, or unverified claims and is not YearBull editorial analysis.
Official links and contract records appear in Key Facts. Project details can change, so verify current information with the project.
Zenko Protocol (ZENKO) FAQ
How does Zenko connect brand campaigns with token rewards?
Zenko states that brands fund on-chain incentive campaigns, while users receive ZENKO for completing activities such as learning, moving, shopping, or playing. The project presents this structure as a way for advertisers to encourage measurable participation and potentially reduce cost per lead. The supplied claims do not specify eligibility rules, campaign terms, or how rewards are calculated for each activity.
How does Zenko describe its fee allocation and buyback process?
The project says its fee loop allocates 50% to automatic ZENKO buybacks and directs the remaining 50% toward environmental and social projects selected through holder voting. Zenko presents this as a mechanism linking commercial activity with token demand and community-directed impact. The precise fee rate, buyback timing, execution method, and voting rules are not specified.
What types of experiences does the Zenko token support?
Zenko positions ZENKO as a shared token across several engagement formats: Learn-to-Earn, Move-to-Earn, Shop-to-Earn, and Play-to-Earn. In these models, participants are described as earning tokens by completing actions connected to campaigns or applications. The project does not specify the individual applications, participation requirements, reward formulas, or whether all four formats are currently active.
How does Zenko link token activity to environmental and social outcomes?
Zenko says that rewards are connected to real-world impact, including examples such as trees planted and carbon offsets recorded on-chain. The project also states that holders can vote on environmental and social initiatives receiving part of the fee allocation. It does not specify the verification organizations, measurement standards, reporting schedule, or procedures used to confirm each outcome.
What does Zenko claim about its brand and enterprise adoption?
The project states that it is already live with enterprise clients, including Fortune 500 brands and professional sports teams. Zenko also claims that brands can reduce cost per lead by more than 35% while producing measurable environmental, social, and governance outcomes. No client names, campaign details, independent validation, or methodology for the cost-per-lead figure are specified.
Zenko Protocol metric comparison
This comparison is a stored snapshot generated 2026-10-23 06:31 UTC from 293 daily observations available from 2025-12-30 through 2026-10-23. It is separate from the latest analytical cards above. Percentiles compare the snapshot value with that day's analytical universe; a higher percentile means a larger observed value, not necessarily a better investment characteristic.
Metric
Snapshot
30d before
90d before
Change vs 30d
Universe percentile
Price
$0.00059711
$0.00046628
$0.00046628
+28.1%
n/a
Market cap
$101.3K
$79.1K
$79.1K
+28.1%
P34.5
YearBull Rank
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Bull Score
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Turnover
0.01%
0.01%
0.01%
+0.0 pts
P12.0
YB Market Risk
n/a
n/a
Low
n/a
n/a
Cycle
n/a
n/a
Early
n/a
n/a
Median absolute daily movement 0.00%; distance from the highest local daily price -89.2%; circulating supply change -15.3%. These measurements are descriptive and do not predict future direction.
YearBull Rank update
Newest YearBull Rank value for zenko-protocol: #4409.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (nearest points).
Reading rule: smaller rank numbers are better.
7d window: no reference point available.
30d window (2026-09-26): #2137 → #4409 (down by 2272).
YearBull Rank is a comparative index on YearBull that helps contextualize a coin’s position versus others over time. A smaller rank number indicates a stronger position at that moment.
Liquidity posture: stable placement often correlates with stable participation. If the curve improves but won’t hold, treat it as flow-driven.
Cycle placement: in rotations, improving rank can happen without price leadership. If 7d and 30d disagree, treat it as a transition window.
Risk angle: short bursts do not always translate into durable placement. If the last week is quiet, the current rank is usually easier to trust.
Access context: one venue can dominate the profile in short windows. If the line range widens, access or routing may be changing.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
Related Research
Continue with contextually connected profiles and category data:
Stored venue snapshot. Markets last checked: 2026-08-14. Updated on a rolling basis; no fixed refresh date is promised. Venue listings and volumes are stored snapshots, not live quotes.
No exchange markets were returned by the public venue source when last checked on 2026-08-14.
Embed coin widget
Add a current YearBull daily snapshot to any website.
