Trading activity:
Reported 24-hour volume equals 0.00% of market capitalization. The local markets snapshot lists Orca and Uniswap V4 (Ethereum) among venues with observed trading activity.
YearBull indicators:
YearBull Rank #2,573. Bull Score 68/100.
YB Market Risk Low. This relative market-volatility label is not an investment-safety assessment.
Cycle Early. Observed price change: 24h 0.00% · 7d 1.62% · 30d 2.79%.
Values are descriptive and should be read together rather than as a price forecast.
Read the YearBull methodology.
Snapshot date: 2026-10-27.Data history: 90 days available in the latest 90-day window.
Methodology responsibility:
YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by
Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher.
This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.
What is Allbridge (ABR)?
Source description
“Allbridge is modular and expanding token bridge with on-chain consensus. It’s a simple, modern, and reliable way to transfer assets between blockchain networks. Allbridge mission is to make the blockchain world borderless and provide a tool to freely move assets between different networks. In the future it will evolve into a DAO-style multi-chain hub, establishing connections between the EVM and non-EVM networks.”
This source-supplied description may contain old, promotional, or unverified claims and is not YearBull editorial analysis.
Recorded networks: Ethereum, Fantom, Near Protocol, Huobi Token, Aurora, Celo
Official links and contract records appear in Key Facts. Project details can change, so verify current information with the project.
Allbridge (ABR) FAQ
How does Allbridge describe its approach to connecting blockchain networks?
The project presents Allbridge as a modular token bridge intended to support transfers between multiple blockchain networks. It says the system is built around on-chain consensus and aims to offer a simple, modern, and reliable way to move assets across networks. These statements describe the project’s positioning; specific consensus procedures, validation rules, and operational safeguards are not specified.
Why does Allbridge emphasize connections between EVM and non-EVM networks?
Allbridge says its broader goal is to connect EVM and non-EVM networks, allowing assets to move across ecosystems with different technical designs. This positioning is intended to address fragmentation between blockchain environments. The project does not specify which individual assets are supported on each connection, nor does it explain the exact process used to maintain compatibility between these network types.
What role could on-chain consensus play in Allbridge’s bridge model?
Allbridge identifies on-chain consensus as part of its bridge model. In general terms, this indicates that agreement related to cross-network transfers is intended to be handled through blockchain-recorded processes rather than relying solely on an off-chain arrangement. The project does not specify the participants, voting structure, thresholds, or dispute procedures involved in that consensus mechanism.
How does Allbridge frame its future governance direction?
The project says Allbridge may evolve into a DAO-style, multi-chain hub. This points toward a possible future in which connected communities or token holders participate in decisions about the bridge and its network expansion. However, no governance framework, voting rights, proposal process, treasury structure, or implementation timetable is specified, so this remains a stated future direction rather than a defined operating model.
Which blockchain ecosystems does Allbridge position itself across?
Allbridge is associated with a broad set of ecosystems, including Ethereum, BNB Chain, Solana, Avalanche, Polygon, Near Protocol, Fantom, Celo, Aurora, and Huobi ECO Chain. The project’s stated mission is to make asset movement between networks more accessible. The listing of these ecosystems does not by itself establish that every asset or transfer route is active, equivalent, or supported in the same way.
Allbridge metric comparison
This comparison is a stored snapshot generated 2026-10-23 06:31 UTC from 293 daily observations available from 2025-12-30 through 2026-10-23. It is separate from the latest analytical cards above. Percentiles compare the snapshot value with that day's analytical universe; a higher percentile means a larger observed value, not necessarily a better investment characteristic.
Metric
Snapshot
30d before
90d before
Change vs 30d
Universe percentile
Price
$0.0258
$0.0249
$0.0599
+3.6%
n/a
Market cap
$528.0K
$509.8K
$1.22M
+3.6%
P58.1
YearBull Rank
n/a
#8,237
#1,138
n/a
n/a
Bull Score
n/a
22/100
65/100
n/a
n/a
Turnover
0.00%
0.00%
0.01%
0.0 pts
P1.7
YB Market Risk
n/a
Low
Low
n/a
n/a
Cycle
n/a
Early
Early
n/a
n/a
Median absolute daily movement 1.68%; distance from the highest local daily price -63.8%; circulating supply change 0.0%. These measurements are descriptive and do not predict future direction.
YearBull Rank update
Latest available YearBull Rank for allbridge: #2573.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank movement (nearest daily data).
Reading rule: a smaller rank number indicates stronger placement.
7d window (2026-10-21): #3890 → #2573 (up by 1317).
30d window (2026-09-28): #7811 → #2573 (up by 5238).
Cycle view: If the line is range-bound, treat changes as relative, not absolute.
Execution context: If rank holds gains, the footprint is likely supporting the move.
Risk placement: If the last month is chaotic, widen the lookback before concluding.
Liquidity framing: If the line flatlines, the coin may be moving with its liquidity peers.
YearBull Rank is a relative placement score used on YearBull to compare a coin against peers within the same dataset. A smaller rank number indicates a stronger position at that moment.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
Related Research
Continue with contextually connected profiles and category data:
Vertus analysis - nearby market scale in the current dataset.
HOLD analysis - nearby market scale in the current dataset.
Stored venue snapshot. Markets last checked: 2026-07-27. Updated on a rolling basis; no fixed refresh date is promised. Venue listings and volumes are stored snapshots, not live quotes.
