- Fidelity Digital Dollar (FIDD) research overview
- Historical market behavior
- YearBull metric interpretation
- Market structure and supply
- Key risks and limits
- Primary sources and review scope
- Fidelity Digital Dollar: A Centrally Issued Ethereum Stablecoin With Institutional Controls
- What FIDD is designed to do
- Ethereum implementation and token mechanics
- Transfer restrictions and administrative control
- Who can use FIDD
- Governance, dependencies, and limitations
- Key takeaways
- Risks and open questions
- YearBull Rank overview
Fidelity Digital Dollar (FIDD) research overview
Fidelity Digital Dollar (FIDD) is tracked by YearBull under the source identifier fidelity-digital-dollar. The stored profile does not yet provide a sufficiently specific sector classification. Category labels describe market context; they do not prove project activity, adoption, or investment quality.
Market structure and supply
Observed market capitalization is about $49.88 million and reported 24 hour volume is about $55.57 million. That volume equals 111.40% of market capitalization in the dated snapshot. Current circulating supply is 49,890,415. Recorded total supply is 49,890,415. Circulating supply changed +1.1% across the available historical window. Reported volume and supply fields can change through source revisions, issuance, burns, migrations, or venue coverage.
Key risks and limits
Liquidity depth, holder concentration, contract or network controls, token issuance, venue availability, governance, and operational dependencies remain material. Historical metrics describe the available YearBull record; they do not predict future returns. Contract addresses, network support, custody, and venue availability should be verified before use.
Primary sources and review scope
YearBull methodology. Identity, categories, supply, and historical market fields were reviewed from locally stored source records on 2026-09-12. The live analytical snapshot may be newer than this editorial review.
Fidelity Digital Dollar: A Centrally Issued Ethereum Stablecoin With Institutional Controls
Fidelity Digital Dollar, or FIDD, is a dollar-denominated Ethereum token issued by Fidelity Digital Assets, National Association. Its design combines a one-dollar redemption promise with centralized issuance, transfer controls, reserve management, and account-based access requirements.
What FIDD is designed to do
FIDD is an Ethereum-based stablecoin intended to represent one U.S. dollar per token. Fidelity Digital Assets, National Association issues the token and states that eligible customers can purchase or redeem FIDD for one dollar through its own platforms. The product is designed for payments and digital-asset settlement rather than for generating returns. This makes FIDD closer to a digital payment instrument than to a conventional cryptocurrency with an independent monetary policy.
The issuer describes FIDD as fully backed by dollar-denominated assets with a value at least equal to the outstanding supply. The stated reserve categories include cash, U.S. Treasuries, and other permitted liquid assets. Fidelity says reserve assets are held in segregated accounts and that reserve reports are prepared monthly and examined by PricewaterhouseCoopers under AICPA attestation standards. These are issuer disclosures and attestations, not the same as a government guarantee or deposit insurance.
Ethereum implementation and token mechanics
The official contract repository identifies FIDD as an ERC-20 token on Ethereum mainnet with 18 decimals. The published address is 0x7C135549504245B5eAe64fc0E99Fa5ebabb8e35D. Etherscan identifies the deployed address as an ERC-1967 proxy, meaning the user-facing address delegates calls to a separate implementation contract. This preserves the token address while allowing the implementation to be replaced under the contract’s upgrade process.
The repository describes a controlled minting framework rather than permissionless issuance. A minting role can create tokens within an allocation, while a separate allocation role can adjust those limits. The contracts also include burning functions, a global pause function, and transfer-restriction functions. These mechanisms are practical for a regulated issuer because supply can be synchronized with purchases and redemptions, but they also mean that FIDD depends on Fidelity-controlled permissions rather than on an autonomous issuance schedule.
Transfer restrictions and administrative control
FIDD’s contract design includes a denylist or restriction list. The repository states that restricted accounts cannot use the token and that tokens already held by a restricted account can be frozen until the restriction is removed. Fidelity’s public product page likewise says that transfers to addresses frozen or restricted by Fidelity may fail, even when the holder keeps FIDD outside a Fidelity account. This is a material difference from censorship-resistant assets: possessing the private key does not guarantee that the token can be transferred.
The published roles include minter, mint allocator, upgrader, transfer controller, and pauser. The upgrade role can change the implementation behind the proxy, while the pauser can halt token activity. The repository was archived on February 10, 2026 and describes its contents as a frozen point-in-time snapshot of the contracts and deployment tooling. That archival status does not remove the deployed contract’s administrative powers; it means the public repository should be treated as documentation for the published deployment rather than as an active development feed.
Who can use FIDD
FIDD has two distinct access layers. Ethereum users may hold and transfer the ERC-20 token to eligible mainnet addresses, subject to contract restrictions. Direct purchase and redemption with Fidelity require a Fidelity Crypto or Fidelity Digital Assets account in good standing, and retail access depends on jurisdiction, identity verification, anti-money-laundering checks, sanctions screening, and other account-opening requirements. A holder without a qualifying account cannot simply demand redemption from the issuer.
The intended users therefore include institutional clients, Fidelity Crypto customers, advisors using Fidelity Crypto for Wealth Managers, and Ethereum users who need a dollar-denominated settlement asset. Fidelity presents the token as part of a full-service model: Fidelity Digital Assets handles issuance and redemption, while Fidelity Management & Research Company manages reserve assets. The usefulness of FIDD outside Fidelity’s own distribution channels will depend on exchange listings, wallet support, counterparties, and acceptance by Ethereum applications.
Governance, dependencies, and limitations
FIDD does not present a community governance system in the materials reviewed. Control is concentrated in the issuing institution and the privileged contract roles. The token’s operation therefore depends on Fidelity’s custody, compliance, reserve administration, account systems, Ethereum mainnet, and the continued availability of the issuer’s redemption service. The reserve promise is also conditional: the terms state that redemption is subject to eligibility requirements, applicable law, and the applicable account agreement.
Fidelity’s terms expressly state that FIDD is not money or legal tender and is not backed, issued, or guaranteed by the FDIC, SIPC, or another government agency. The one-dollar objective is therefore a contractual redemption arrangement with Fidelity Digital Assets, not a claim on the U.S. government. Users also face ordinary Ethereum risks, including transaction fees, wallet errors, smart-contract vulnerabilities, implementation changes, and possible disruption if the issuer pauses transfers or restricts an address. The repository links an OpenZeppelin audit report, but an audit does not eliminate operational, legal, reserve, or governance risk.
Key takeaways
- FIDD is an ERC-20 stablecoin on Ethereum designed to maintain a one-dollar redemption value through Fidelity Digital Assets.
- Supply is centrally controlled through privileged minting, burning, pausing, transfer-restriction, and upgrade roles.
- The token’s reserve backing and redemption promise depend on Fidelity’s legal, operational, and account-access framework.
- Ethereum holders may transfer FIDD, but restricted addresses can be blocked or frozen by issuer-controlled mechanisms.
- FIDD is not government money, legal tender, FDIC-insured, or SIPC-protected.
- Its practical utility depends on Fidelity access, eligible jurisdictions, exchange and wallet support, and acceptance by counterparties.
Risks and open questions
- Centralized administrative roles can mint, burn, pause, restrict transfers, and upgrade the contract.
- Redemption is available only to eligible users with qualifying Fidelity accounts and may be limited by jurisdiction or compliance requirements.
- Reserve backing is primarily supported by issuer disclosures and external examinations described by Fidelity; users still carry issuer and custody risk.
- The token is not backed or guaranteed by the FDIC, SIPC, or another government agency.
- Ethereum transaction costs, wallet mistakes, contract defects, implementation changes, or network disruption can affect usability.
- The reviewed materials do not establish broad independent adoption across exchanges, decentralized applications, or payment merchants.
YearBull Rank overview
Newest YearBull Rank value for fidelity-digital-dollar: #179.
Rank change (daily snapshots).
Reading rule: smaller rank numbers are better.
- 7d window (2026-09-21): #80001 → #179 (up by 79822).
- 30d window (2026-08-29): #23 → #179 (down by 156).
YearBull Rank is a relative placement score used on YearBull to compare a coin against peers within the same dataset. It is a context signal for relative placement, not an outcome forecast.
Risk angle: minor drift can still matter at scale. If the curve whipsaws, treat the rank as fragile.
Orderflow context: deep markets usually produce smoother rank paths. If the curve improves but won’t hold, treat it as flow-driven.
Cycle framing: in rotations, improving rank can happen without price leadership. If 7d and 30d disagree, treat it as a transition window.
Exchange footprint: fragmentation can make rank more reactive. If the line range widens, access or routing may be changing.

