Trading activity:
Reported 24-hour volume equals 0.36% of market capitalization. The local markets snapshot lists Uniswap V2 (Ethereum) among venues with observed trading activity.
YearBull indicators:
YearBull Rank #10,634. Bull Score 38/100.
YB Market Risk Low. This relative market-volatility label is not an investment-safety assessment.
Cycle Late. Observed price change: 24h -33.18% · 7d -48.32% · 30d -7.29%.
Values are descriptive and should be read together rather than as a price forecast.
Read the YearBull methodology.
Snapshot date: 2026-10-27.Data history: 90 days available in the latest 90-day window.
Methodology responsibility:
YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by
Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher.
This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.
What is Polkaswap (PSWAP)?
Source description
“Polkaswap is a next-generation, cross-chain liquidity aggregator DEX protocol for swapping tokens based on the Polkadot (and Kusama) network(s), parachains, and other connected blockchains . Through the development of bridge technologies, Polkaswap can also enables the trading of Ethereum-based tokens and tokens from other blockchains For example, the development of the Bitcoin bridge is near completion and Bitcoin will soon be tradable on Polkaswap. This trading is done seamlessly, at high speed and low fees, while exchanging assets in a non-custodial manner on the SORA network.”
This source-supplied description may contain old, promotional, or unverified claims and is not YearBull editorial analysis.
Official links and contract records appear in Key Facts. Project details can change, so verify current information with the project.
Polkaswap (PSWAP) FAQ
How does Polkaswap approach liquidity aggregation across connected networks?
Polkaswap presents itself as a cross-chain liquidity aggregator and decentralized exchange protocol. The project says it is intended to support token swaps involving Polkadot and Kusama networks, their parachains, and other connected blockchains. This positioning focuses on combining liquidity across multiple ecosystems rather than limiting exchanges to assets native to a single network.
What role do bridge technologies play in Polkaswap’s planned asset coverage?
The project states that bridge technologies allow Polkaswap to support trading of Ethereum-based assets and tokens from other blockchains. It also says a Bitcoin bridge was nearing completion, which would enable Bitcoin trading on the platform. These statements describe the project’s intended interoperability capabilities and should not be read as confirmation that every referenced bridge is currently operational.
Why does Polkaswap use the SORA network for asset exchange?
Polkaswap says its swaps take place on the SORA network and are intended to be seamless, fast, and low-cost. The project also presents the process as non-custodial, meaning users are positioned as retaining control of their assets rather than handing them to a centralized exchange operator. The specific fee structure and performance parameters are not specified.
Which ecosystems does Polkaswap aim to connect for token swaps?
Polkaswap describes an intended reach spanning Polkadot, Kusama, their parachains, Ethereum-based assets, and other connected blockchains. Its stated cross-chain focus is designed to bring tokens from these ecosystems into one swapping environment on SORA. The project does not specify a complete list of supported assets or confirm that all named ecosystems have identical functionality.
How does Polkaswap characterize its custody model?
The project characterizes Polkaswap as a non-custodial exchange environment. In that model, users are intended to exchange assets without transferring ongoing custody to a centralized intermediary. Polkaswap also links this approach to its SORA-based trading process. The project does not specify the complete wallet flow, transaction-signing process, or recovery procedures involved in using the platform.
Polkaswap metric comparison
This comparison is a stored snapshot generated 2026-10-23 06:31 UTC from 293 daily observations available from 2025-12-30 through 2026-10-23. It is separate from the latest analytical cards above. Percentiles compare the snapshot value with that day's analytical universe; a higher percentile means a larger observed value, not necessarily a better investment characteristic.
Metric
Snapshot
30d before
90d before
Change vs 30d
Universe percentile
Price
$0.00025031
$0.00028278
$0.00035787
-11.5%
n/a
Market cap
$865.7K
$978.0K
$1.24M
-11.5%
P63.7
YearBull Rank
#7,158
#6,037
#5,685
Lower by 1,121
P16.2
Bull Score
32/100
32/100
35/100
0.0 pts
P24.1
Turnover
0.01%
0.01%
0.11%
0.0 pts
P9.7
YB Market Risk
Low
Low
Medium
Unchanged
n/a
Cycle
Late
Early
Late
Early → Late
n/a
Median absolute daily movement 6.12%; distance from the highest local daily price -59.4%; circulating supply change +0.1%. These measurements are descriptive and do not predict future direction.
YearBull Rank context
Newest YearBull Rank value for polkaswap: #10634.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (daily snapshots).
Reading rule: smaller rank numbers are better.
7d window (2026-10-21): #8247 → #10634 (down by 2387).
30d window (2026-09-28): #8494 → #10634 (down by 2140).
YearBull Rank is a comparative index on YearBull that helps contextualize a coin’s position versus others over time. A smaller rank number indicates a stronger position at that moment. It is a context signal for relative placement, not an outcome forecast.
Risk angle: short bursts do not always translate into durable placement. If the curve whipsaws, treat the rank as fragile.
Orderflow context: deep markets usually produce smoother rank paths. If the curve improves but won’t hold, treat it as flow-driven.
Cycle framing: phase changes usually leave a footprint in consistency. If the line breaks range, confirm with more than one week.
Market structure: fragmentation can make rank more reactive. If rank can’t hold gains, it can be concentrated pressure.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
Related Research
Continue with contextually connected profiles and category data:
Stored venue snapshot. Markets last checked: 2026-07-27. Updated on a rolling basis; no fixed refresh date is promised. Venue listings and volumes are stored snapshots, not live quotes.
