Trading activity:
Reported 24-hour volume equals 0.00% of market capitalization. The local markets snapshot lists Uniswap V2 (Ethereum) among venues with observed trading activity.
YearBull indicators:
YearBull Rank #10,499. Bull Score 9/100.
YB Market Risk Low. This relative market-volatility label is not an investment-safety assessment.
Cycle Mid. Observed price change: 24h -0.29% · 7d -3.26% · 30d -58.03%.
Values are descriptive and should be read together rather than as a price forecast.
Read the YearBull methodology.
Snapshot date: 2026-10-27.Data history: 90 days available in the latest 90-day window.
Methodology responsibility:
YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by
Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher.
This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.
What is Ajna Protocol (AJNA)?
Source description
“The Ajna protocol facilitates peer-to-pool secured loans without governance and without external price feeds. Current lending and borrowing protocols which utilize smart contracts require active governance (e.g. to set rates and to update contracts) and/or rely on external price feeds (such as oracles like Chainlink). Because the pricing of collateral and parameterization of loans are left to subjective decision making through governance rather than market forces, these protocols carry both solvency and liquidity risk. Governance and maintenance overhead create barriers to entry in the market for lending and borrowing of on-chain assets. Ajna solves these problems with its unique design, which is defined by the following features: Permissionless pool creation: Much like the popular DeFi primitive, the “automated market maker,” AMM, Ajna pools exist in unique pairs: quote token, provided by lenders and collateral token, provided by borrowers. Pools allow lenders to assess borrower demand for their quote token and for borrowers to assess lender demand for loans backed by their collateral. Pools are created permissionlessly, meaning anyone can create a pool to borrow arbitrary fungible tokens using arbitrary fungible or non-fungible tokens as collateral. Therefore, no governance process is needed to whitelist approved tokens. Price specified lending: Ajna replaces external price feeds (oracles) by allowing lenders to input the price at which they’re willing to lend. This price is the amount of quote token (i.e. the token they are lending) they are willing to lend per unit of collateral pledged by the borrower. For example, if a lender deposits at price 100, they are willing to lend 100 units of quote token per one unit of collateral.”
This source-supplied description may contain old, promotional, or unverified claims and is not YearBull editorial analysis.
Official links and contract records appear in Key Facts. Project details can change, so verify current information with the project.
Ajna Protocol metric comparison
This comparison is a stored snapshot generated 2026-10-22 06:31 UTC from 292 daily observations available from 2025-12-30 through 2026-10-22. It is separate from the latest analytical cards above. Percentiles compare the snapshot value with that day's analytical universe; a higher percentile means a larger observed value, not necessarily a better investment characteristic.
Metric
Snapshot
30d before
90d before
Change vs 30d
Universe percentile
Price
$0.0011057
$0.00228597
$0.00058896
-51.6%
n/a
Market cap
$873.6K
$1.81M
$468.1K
-51.6%
P63.5
YearBull Rank
#8,227
#6,970
#5,736
Lower by 1,257
P3.5
Bull Score
9/100
74/100
36/100
-65.0 pts
P1.5
Turnover
0.00%
0.01%
0.01%
0.0 pts
P3.2
YB Market Risk
Low
High
Low
High → Low
n/a
Cycle
Mid
Late
Early
Late → Mid
n/a
Median absolute daily movement 1.20%; distance from the highest local daily price -74.3%; circulating supply change +0.7%. These measurements are descriptive and do not predict future direction.
YearBull Rank timeline
Current YearBull Rank for ajna-protocol: #10499.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (reference points).
Reading rule: smaller rank numbers are better.
7d window (2026-10-20): #8658 → #10499 (down by 1841).
30d window (2026-09-27): #5638 → #10499 (down by 4861).
Downside posture: consistency often matters more than speed.
Venue angle: a broader footprint often smooths the rank trajectory.
Flow read: a quiet tape can still re-rank the pack.
Cycle read: a quick bounce can still be a mean-reversion phase.
Practical note: rank is best used for relative context, not certainty.
YearBull Rank is a relative placement score used on YearBull to compare a coin against peers within the same dataset. It is a context signal for relative placement, not an outcome forecast.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
Related Research
Continue with contextually connected profiles and category data:
hehe analysis - nearby market scale in the current dataset.
Stored venue snapshot. Markets last checked: 2026-07-26. Updated on a rolling basis; no fixed refresh date is promised. Venue listings and volumes are stored snapshots, not live quotes.
