Trading activity:
Reported 24-hour volume equals 0.00% of market capitalization. The local markets snapshot lists Uniswap V2 (Base) among venues with observed trading activity.
YearBull indicators:
YearBull Rank #4,509. Bull Score 62/100.
YB Market Risk Low. This relative market-volatility label is not an investment-safety assessment.
Cycle Early. Observed price change: 24h 0.00% · 7d 0.00% · 30d -22.22%.
Values are descriptive and should be read together rather than as a price forecast.
Read the YearBull methodology.
Snapshot date: 2026-10-27.Data history: 90 days available in the latest 90-day window.
Methodology responsibility:
YearBull’s analytical methodology and presentation rules are developed and maintained by
Alan Zelvin, Founder & Lead Crypto Researcher.
This note identifies responsibility for the methodology; it does not attribute authorship of this data snapshot.
What is Charred Treasures (CHARRED)?
Source description
“Charred Treasures is a Real-World Asset (RWA) project that introduces the concept of tokenized active management. The project introduces a Curator model in which a domain expert oversees procurement and strategic decisions for the project vault, integrating elements from traditional finance asset management and on-chain mechanisms to support the long-term growth of the underlying reserve. The token reflects exposure to the performance of this curated portfolio. For this project, the mandate will be for the Curator to acquire Base Set 1st Edition Charizard Pokemon cards.”
This source-supplied description may contain old, promotional, or unverified claims and is not YearBull editorial analysis.
Official links and contract records appear in Key Facts. Project details can change, so verify current information with the project.
Charred Treasures (CHARRED) FAQ
How does the Curator model shape Charred Treasures’ portfolio management?
Charred Treasures presents a Curator model in which a domain expert oversees procurement and strategic decisions for the project vault. This approach combines an individual’s subject-matter role with on-chain mechanisms, with the stated aim of supporting the reserve’s long-term growth. The project does not specify the Curator’s identity, appointment process, decision limits, reporting duties, or removal mechanism.
What assets does the Charred Treasures mandate target?
The project states that its mandate is for the Curator to acquire Base Set 1st Edition Charizard Pokémon cards. These physical trading cards represent the underlying reserve associated with the tokenized portfolio. The project does not specify the targeted number of cards, acquisition criteria, storage arrangements, insurance coverage, authentication process, valuation method, or procedures for handling damaged or disputed items.
How does CHARRED relate to the curated portfolio?
Charred Treasures says the token reflects exposure to the performance of its curated portfolio. In practical terms, the portfolio is centered on the targeted Pokémon card holdings overseen through the Curator model. The project does not specify whether token holders own the cards directly, how performance is calculated, whether redemptions are possible, or how expenses and realized sales affect token holders.
What does tokenized active management mean in Charred Treasures’ design?
The project uses the term tokenized active management for an arrangement that combines traditional finance-style asset management with on-chain mechanisms. Rather than presenting the reserve as passively held, Charred Treasures emphasizes ongoing procurement and strategic decisions by a Curator. It does not specify the smart-contract functions, voting rights, rebalancing rules, or other controls that implement this management process.
Why is Charred Treasures associated with Base?
Charred Treasures is positioned within the Base ecosystem, and its network listing identifies Base as the deployment network. The project’s stated focus is linking an on-chain token with a curated reserve of physical Charizard cards. It does not explain which Base features are essential to the model, nor does it specify transaction costs, contract architecture, or any Base-native integrations.
Charred Treasures metric comparison
This comparison is a stored snapshot generated 2026-10-23 06:31 UTC from 293 daily observations available from 2025-12-30 through 2026-10-23. It is separate from the latest analytical cards above. Percentiles compare the snapshot value with that day's analytical universe; a higher percentile means a larger observed value, not necessarily a better investment characteristic.
Metric
Snapshot
30d before
90d before
Change vs 30d
Universe percentile
Price
$1.40
$1.38
$0.9048
+1.4%
n/a
Market cap
$2.23M
$2.20M
$1.45M
+1.4%
P73.5
YearBull Rank
n/a
#1,787
#2,405
n/a
n/a
Bull Score
n/a
87/100
53/100
n/a
n/a
Turnover
0.00%
1.44%
0.00%
-1.4 pts
P1.0
YB Market Risk
n/a
High
Low
n/a
n/a
Cycle
n/a
Mid
Early
n/a
n/a
Median absolute daily movement 0.04%; distance from the highest local daily price -28.6%; circulating supply change 0.0%. These measurements are descriptive and do not predict future direction.
YearBull Rank on this page
YearBull Rank now for charred-treasures: #4509.
Rank timeline (last 365 days)
Rank change (reference points).
Reading rule: lower is better in this ranking.
7d window (2026-10-21): #3063 → #4509 (down by 1446).
30d window (2026-09-29): #5396 → #4509 (up by 887).
YearBull Rank is a relative ranking on YearBull designed to compare coins on a common scale and time window. It is meant for comparison and tracking, not certainty.
Phase read: If the line stair-steps, the cycle may be driven by discrete inputs. cycle shifts often show up as slope changes, not spikes.
Liquidity note: If the line improves during quiet periods, it can be accumulation. relative rank is sensitive to who is active in the window.
Listing context: If the line is step-like, watch for discrete market changes. consolidation can make rank more stable.
Risk note: If you see repeated snap-backs, assume sensitivity to one factor. range behavior tells more than a single point.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
Related Research
Continue with contextually connected profiles and category data:
Venue refresh pending. Markets last checked: 2026-07-27. The next refresh is queued in the hourly updater. Venue listings and volumes are stored snapshots, not live quotes.
