About Ether.fi (ETHFI):
Ether.fi (ETHFI) trades around $0.379599, backed by $351.95M capitalization and $32.43M of 24h volume. Liquidity remains strong day-to-day turnover (volume/market cap 9.22%) This level of turnover generally supports steadier intraday liquidity..
- Dominance 0.01% - reflecting a modest slice of the broader market
Where it trades:
Liquidity is most consistently available on Azbit, Binance and AscendEX (BitMax), where Ether.fi (ETHFI) sees the bulk of observed activity. Depth and spreads can shift as volume rotates between venues. A broader venue footprint can help smooth execution during normal conditions.
Market assessment:
Bull score 51/100 suggests moderate momentum with modest trend traction with modest trend traction rather than a clean trend..
Windowed performance: -10.07% (24h), -12.65% (7d), 19.71% (30d). The mix suggests a pullback within a broader positive backdrop. The 24h tape is lively, though still within moderate bounds. Risk is assessed as Low, which implies relatively stable conditions with controlled volatility Even in low-risk regimes, rapid moves can appear during macro events..
Ether.fi (ETHFI) is positioned in the Late phase,
typically associated with conditions consistent with late-cycle maturity This phase can transition quickly if momentum breaks down..
Capped supply provides a defined upper bound for total issuance.
Conclusion: Bottom line: the structure currently reflects a transitional structure with no dominant directional bias. Update date: 2026-07-14.
7d window (2026-07-07): #2879 → #3435 (down by 556).
30d window (2026-06-14): #970 → #3435 (down by 2465).
Risk read: consistency often matters more than speed.
Venue context: a tightened venue set can reduce variance or increase it.
Market depth: a quiet tape can still re-rank the pack.
Market phase: a single week rarely defines a phase on its own.
Practical note: if you only read one thing, read the slope.
YearBull Rank is a comparative ordering used on YearBull to place a coin versus others using a consistent set of inputs. Lower values mean higher placement in the YearBull ordering. It is meant for comparison and tracking, not certainty.
Editorial note:
This analysis was prepared by the YearBull research team under the direction of
Alan Zelvin,
Founder and Lead Crypto Researcher.
The assessment follows YearBull’s internal research methodology and editorial standards.
Methodology ·
Editorial Policy
We use cookies and similar technologies to improve site functionality, analyze usage, and enhance user experience.
By continuing to use YearBull, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our
Privacy Policy.
Comments